in my opinion yes- you basically can't avoid clonal selection due to extensive passaging the cells. For cancer cell lines, I would not go beyond passage 30.
I would stay in the same range if you like to keep your experiments compareable.
as a general rule of tumb I always go for as low as possible (to have enought frozen stocks acquired) in passage number.
in my opinion yes- you basically can't avoid clonal selection due to extensive passaging the cells. For cancer cell lines, I would not go beyond passage 30.
I would stay in the same range if you like to keep your experiments compareable.
as a general rule of tumb I always go for as low as possible (to have enought frozen stocks acquired) in passage number.
I would be very cautious about comparing high and low passage numbers for wound healing and proliferation assays.
With each passage, you run the risk of unintentionally selecting for more adherent cells, especially if you re-use the same flask between passages. This could affect the wound healing assay because increased adherence could affect migration/metastasis (Leung-Tack et al Int J Cancer. 1988).
With each passage, there is also the risk for clonal expansion of cells that proliferate faster (Hughes et al, Biotechniques. 2007), which could eventually take over your cell line. Therefore cell proliferation assays should be done on cells with similar passage numbers.
I have experience in studying genetic aberrations of leukemic and breast cancer cell lines before. In the study, we have found that cancer cell line with passage number more than 15 have got chromosome and gene changes. This really an interesting question. I wonder if there any articles which may support your point Elisabeth Stein and Fen Li besides information that have been given by Jason Higa.