10 October 2014 8 683 Report

Hi,

We've noticed significant contamination on SEM images of gold-coated optical fibers.  We've determined the contamination is likely happening during the protein detection phase, as imaging fibers prior to the experiments show very clean surfaces under identical conditions.

I've attached two images (not same magnification) for comparison.  Sorry that these don't have scale bars, but the nanoparticles are about 22nm and the bacteria are > 1um.

It's clear to me that this is partially a bacterial contamination, although some "gunky" crap is also in there that does not seem bacterial.  This actually could be aggregated proteins from high-concentration experiments, unless you guys have any other ideas?

Anyway, we've been using filtered buffers, run through a 200nm filter.  The clean image, f5, has been exposed to several of these buffers and shows no contamination.

We believe we've isolated two sources of contamination.  Either a non-filtered ph10 buffer (http://www.coleparmer.com/Product/Thermo_Scientific_Orion_10_01_pH_buffer_solution_475_mL_bottle/EW-55350-52); could bacteria grow in such conditions?  Alternatively, it could be our BSA protein solution that is contaminated.  The BSA solution is created from dry powder, but the powder is several years old.  Could bacterial literally be living on the solid powder?  Also, we usually use BSA that is 1-2 weeks old.

We're doing growth tests to confirm the source, but anyone who has experience with bacteria/cleanliness, can you give me some advice?  We were thinking of getting dialysis tubes and centrifuging proteins prior to use.

Similar questions and discussions