Infected aortic aneurysms are diagnosed on the basis of a positive bacterial blood culture, clinical evidence of inflammation, and morphologic findings on computed tomography (CT). However, preoperative diagnosis is often difficult because blood cultures are frequently negative and patients can be asymptomatic. Because therapeutic approaches differ significantly, it is vital to determine whether an aortic aneurysm is infected prior to surgery.
There are some literatures which have shown that fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (F-FDG-PET/CT) examination is useful in the diagnosis of infected aortic aneurysms.
However, I wonder whether or not FDG-PET/CT takes place of the conventional imaging diagnosis methods?
【References】
* Clin Nucl Med. 2008 Jul;33(7):492-5.
F-18 FDG PET/CT in the management of infected abdominal aortic aneurysm due to Salmonella.
* Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;28(3):575-8.
Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for diagnosis of infected aortic aneurysms.