We are conducting flow cytometry to detect IL-10 secretion in B cells, specifically regulatory B cells (Bregs). For this purpose, we utilize either whole blood (100 μl) or isolated PBMCs (1 million cells/ml of RPMI-1640+10% FCS). These samples are stimulated with or without CpG (ODN 2006; TLR9 agonist [2-6 μg/ml]) for various time points (16h, 24h, 42h, and 72h). We add DURActive1 (Beckman Coulter), a dry stimulation mix containing PMA, ionomycin, and Brefeldin A, to the reaction during the last five hours of incubation.We also include non-treated and No CpG (samples solely incubated with DURActive1 for 5h) control samples. We utilize a mixture of different fluorescently labelled antibodies to detect IL-10 , Lymphocytes (CD45+ cells), T cells (CD5+ cells), and Bregs (CD19, CD38, CD27, CD11b, CD73, CD39, CD1d, CD24, CD71).

The maximum stimulation effect we have achieved with this setup is approximately 2-4 fold, considering the basal level of IL10+ B cells is below 1%. Surprisingly, CpG-treated samples exhibit lower IL-10 expression compared to samples treated solely with DURActive1, with only a slight increase compared to the non-treated control.

Non-B cells (CD45+CD19-) display a robust response to DURActive1 treatment, exhibiting a 20-30 fold increase in IL-10 expression compared to the non-treated control. However, the addition of CpG does not alter this effect. As the stimulation appears to be effective for non-B cells, we believe the sample preparation and staining protocol for flow cytometry are not of concern.

we actively explore methods to efficiently induce IL-10 expression in B cells. Any feedback or suggestions you may have to improve the current method outlined above or alternative approaches that demonstrated effectiveness, would be greatly appreciated.

More Shahrooz Nasrollahi Shirazi's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions