I am working with the following melanoma cell lines:
WM115 - MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2mM L-glu, 1mM NEAA and 1 mM sodium pyruvate
WM266-4 - MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2mM L-glu, 1mM NEAA and 1 mM sodium pyruvate
WM793 - RPMI glutamax supplemented with 10% FBS
1205Lu - RPMI glutamax supplemented with 10% FBS
Sk-mel-28 - MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2mM L-glu, 1mM NEAA and 1 mM sodium pyruvate
Sk-mel-5 - Not successful
All lines are growing well in the media indicated above except for the Sk-mel-5 cells which I have not yet successfully revived from liquid nitrogen. The media suggested for these cells (and the Sk-mel-28 cells) in our research Institute culture guidelines (and also the literature) is RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS. I revived both the sk-mel-5 and sk-mel-28 lines on the same day; I did not centrifuge to remove DMSO, I put them straight into pre-warmed RPMI with 10% FBS and incubated overnight. The following morning, I found that neither cell line had attached. I repeated this but centrifuged them to remove DMSO, re-suspended and seeded in RPMI. The following morning, the same results, neither line had attached.
There was a second media indicated for the Sk-mel-28 cells (the MEM listed above) in our in house culture guidelines. I tried reviving both (centrifuging both before seeding) in this MEM. The sk-mel-28 cells came back and have been growing really well the last 3-4 weeks. However, the sk-mel-5 cells did not attach again. In fact, I have not yet successfully revived these cells. I have tried reviving cells frozen down on different dates (2003-2008), in different tanks, by different users, centrifuging and not centrifuging prior to seeding. In light of this, I believe that the media is the problem and that I have not yet found the correct one. I have tried reviving them in all the different medias listed in this post with the exception of the RPMI glutamax. Although trying the RPMI glutamax is next, I thought I would post this in case someone has come up against this or a similar problem with this cell line previously. If you have, any and all feedback would be most welcome.