The rapid turnover of personnel in private universities is due to the fact that the majority hires personnel by trimesters, semesters or years, but rarely by more than one generation of university students; basically because they do not want them to have seniority and generate high-cost rights and benefits. Very little staff is based or are of a definitive nature.

Notably, the turnover of faculty members at private universities may be rooted in different factors. For one thing, wrong team structure may undercut the expected development and adversely affect the overall success even when the faculty members are skilled and hard working.Another thing is that some faculty members have a demotivating attitude and influence institutional benefits, and as the result of their poor work displease the learners. Finally, the prosperity of every educational institution depends on a cogent and comprehensive model of staff turnover from the stand point of long term considerations.

I have some experience of lecturing various courses in private institutions and I found that senior positions were given to friends rather than justified making it difficult for talented people to rise. Too many people in all positions were not as academically well trained as they should have been, causing irritation (well, to me). Consequently standards are rarely high in many-but not all.

Owners of private tend to mismanage them especially financially.

favoritism is common

They are certainly mismanaged. A private institution that goes for quality teaching and not money, just money, is more likely to survive.

Many factors dominate the work of private universities, and the financial factor is the basis especially that most of these universities have been established based on the principle of investment.

The rapid turnover of personnel in private universities is due to the fact that the majority hires personnel by trimesters, semesters or years, but rarely by more than one generation of university students; basically because they do not want them to have seniority and generate high-cost rights and benefits. Very little staff is based or are of a definitive nature.

Thanks all for your answers.

Private universities aren't generally subject to the same regulations as government universities. Nor are they as likely to have union-like faculty associations. Thus, they have more leeway in hiring and firing. Also, as already noted by José Luis García Vigil , private universities want to limit the increasing costs of salaries and benefits that come with seniority.

Following the answers

Thanks all for your answers.

the privilege of privacy

I get the impression that all universities are in crisis as, as is the knowledge industry overall, thanks to seismic changes in the distribution of information globally.

Most observers, especially those in traditional media seem content to blame the "disruption", on social media giants, especially Facebook, Google and Twitter.

But I think the Associated Press, the BBC, CNN, Thompson Reuters, Rupert Murdoch's Sky and similar global and national news providers have to accept their responsibility for setting bad examples of education/information provision.

The "privatization" of the knowledge industry, including under state capitalist regimes in Germany and Russia, is always problematic.

You may want to consider the recent announcement by Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg about moving toward a focus on "privacy" from this perspective.

I thought Zuckerberg's comments, following close on the heels of my publication of an "open letter" to an American theologian who had published concerns about seismic shifts "theological education" rather intriguing.

It depends on the private university.

University stands/perform on pillars of,

1. Academic autonomy

2. Administrative autonomy

3. Quality via Research

4. State of art facilities for academic Fraternity

5. Students to faculty ratio for efficient academic performance

In India 'University' is concurrent subject segregated from 'Education' hence centre and state governments have implicit representation

1. State Universities have strong representation of State Goverment in concurrence with UGC with academic and administrative autonomy of University.

2. Centre University are relatively stronger in terms of performance or infrastructure and via Parliament Legislation.

3. Private Universities means Board of Management headed by Private organisations under umbrella of UGC with respect to academic parameters.

Dawn for private universities in India and shall deliver performance in future.

I went to a small private college, and a part of it can be the social and economic geography of the surrounding area. Where do you live and how affordable is it? It’s already been well documented that adjunct teaching is very hard with poor to zero benefits. Where your college is located can drastically effect the affordability factor in your ability to stay in an area. Not only that, but the culture of a place and school can affect if you can live there. Schools that are too rural have a hard time keeping people because access to the community can be barred and there’s already limited public transit services or urban culture. If any private school thinks it can survive, it needs to modernize its surrounding areas or it can’t keep teachers or students; or fulfill its promise to help students achieve professional oppo after they leave school.

Great discussion. Following

Many reasons behind the turnover, the answer should links the turnover rate to specific case.

private universities owners believed if you go another one will come. most of those who are working in the private universities either too young still looking for better situations or too old and retired and can not see wrongs and keeping silent.