I believe inferiority complex. There are many who have little to offer and are very good at harming those who are exceptional. Those who have big egos may become irritants but they know excellence. Amir

I believe inferiority complex. There are many who have little to offer and are very good at harming those who are exceptional. Those who have big egos may become irritants but they know excellence. Amir

In my opinion, both affect the scientific level of the researcher but the effect may be positive in some cases not negative. For example, a superiority complex may prompt the researcher to do more to satisfy himself and "stay ahead".

Dear Dr. Mohammed Salah Nasr, I fully agree with you.Thank you for your very nice answer. Also, excellent answer is given by dear Dr. Amir W. Al-Khafaji. Thanks.

I think between the two thingst

Inferiority complex is not common in the researchers community as- generally speaking- researchers are highly qualified subjects! However, superiority feeling is much more common and I think it can kill the creativity of any researcher and stops his/ her ambitions as such kind of people would rather feel that he/ she stands on the apex while he/ she may have not reached it yet! and may not do throughout life!

This is my opinion and thanks Mr. Hamid Gadouri for raising this discussion

Regards

You are correct dear dr Amir. Some people with big egos may become irritants.

Mental stagnation has the most serious deterioration effect.

I do not see a big ego as denoting big talent. This seems to be the common view here which I found extraordinary. Such people, requiring continuous attention, drain those around them, siphoning away ideas. High intelligence and large egos for me are incompatible. Ideas are everything, egos nothing.

Agree with dr amir

The oscillation between “I’m better than others” and “I’m not good enough” is a kind of noise made by your ego maintenance machinery. It’s meaningless. But, the fact that you take this noise seriously, and believe that maybe it’s telling the truth some of the time, indicates that you’re not clear about who you are.

The machine that’s making this noise is not able to tell you who you are, that’s why it thrashes around between extremes. It’s trying to figure out who you are, but it has nothing reliable to act as a reference — there’s evidence for both viewpoints, yes? Some days you’re the pigeon, and some days you’re the statue.

True self is not some concept which can be compared to assess your value. True self is beyond all such concepts, it transcends concepts and images and narratives of self.

If you imagine that your ego is like a box, and your mind is walking around looking at the box from different angles, it is trying to figure out “what sort of box is this, and are the contents good or bad?” But that’s the wrong question, because you aren’t the box in the first place. You’re more like the space around the box, extending out infinitely in all directions. That’s not something which can be assessed by the box-comparator.

Dear, Dr. Hamid,

I think the most effect is the inferiority... then become the superiority complex. Because, the first appear to be nill.

I think inferiority complex.

If I have to choose its inferiority complex

Dear Dr Hamid Gadouri, the link shared here may be useful

Article How Can We Improve the Quality of Scientific Research and Pu...

Article How Well Establishment of Research Plans Can Improve Scienti...

I think both may impact researchers.

The main reason is the quality and outlook of the administrators and decision takers.

In the developing countries like India, it is perhaps become a permanent un-codified rule that the administrators and decision takers NEVER require sound knowledge on the concerned subjects.

They are selected for other 'qualities', not knowledge.

So, the decisions taken and plans formed with many lacunae and keeping many source of financial and other corruptions.

So, failure and loss of public money is the only possible fate of almost all of such projects.

Agree with Dr. M. Salah Nisar

"In my opinion, both affect the scientific level of the researcher but the effect may be positive in some cases not negative. For example, a superiority complex may prompt the researcher to do more to satisfy himself and "stay ahead".

'Scientific attitute' is achieved by 'Imagination': Inferior or superior words are basically judge by observer and any observation of Inferior quote by observer is relative statement as failure always leads to enormous success and promotes scientific temper.

Scientific phenomenon is related with Imagination, Intelligence achieved by number of experiments (Many failure & only one success).

It is implicitly available in literature

Both Inferiority and superiority complex have effect on the degradation of scientific level of researchers. But Inferiority complex severely degrade the level of the researchers.

While admitting that superiority complex can negative impact the professional well-being of a researcher, inferiority complex is the most degradating of a researcher's scientific progress.

In my opinion, I think superiority complex pose more danger to scientific research development. Yes when competition is healthy, it could promote quality research but when not, it does terrible damage. Inferiority complex may also lead to under-productivity.

For me, superiority complex is originated out of inferiority complex and both are harmful for our intellectual growth as a positive human being.

IN my opinion, Inferiority complex is more serious than superiority complex.

Excellent answers provided by all my RG-colleagues, thank you so much for your very nice contributions and valuable additions.

Dear Hamid Gadouri

Both Inferiority and superiority complex are bad, therefore both have adverse effect on scientific level of researchers. However, the effect of inferiority complex will be more compared to superiority complex.

Good luck!

Dear Dr. Arvind Singh, thank you so much for sharing your opinion.

Both Inferiority and superiority complex, combind not only the degradation of the scientific level of researchers, but also the reflection of society's in respect of scientific research

You're right dear Dr. I fully agree with you that both inferiority and superiority complex have undesirable effects through the reflection of society's in respect of scientific research. Thank you so much for your valuable addition.

Regards

In my opinion, selfishness and jealousy are important reasons.

With the best wishes

Mr Rezaei Ahvanooei.

Dear Dr. Mohamadreza Rezaei Ahvanooei thank you for your answer,

I fully agree with you that both selfishness and jealousy are also important reasons which can negatively affect the scientific level of researchers. Thanks again.

Regards

Psychiatry considers both complexes - as mental deviations, amenable to treatment. Of course, it is difficult to work with such people. However, in one way or another such deviations are manifested in all. Absolutely perfect people do not exist. In other words, there is no perfection in the world.

An inferiority complex, in the fields of psychology and psychoanalysis, is a feeling that one is inferior to others in some way and Superiority complex is a psychological defense mechanism that compensates for an inferiority complex. The term was coined by Alfred Adler as part of his school of individual psychology. It was introduced in his series of books, including "Understanding Human Nature" and "Social Interest".

I also believe that inferiority complex hamper on degradation of scientific researcher but most researchers were highly qualified therefore, i think there are no chances of Superiority complex among the researcher.

I think that the reason for the deterioration of the scientific level is the educational policies in countries where this matter has no strategic dimensions that do not take into account the exits that will be the generations that will come out under the system of this educational policy as well as discouraging scientists to give and development and limited material potential Available to them in implementing their constructive scientific ideas

An inferiority complex

Very nice answer by dear Dr. Leonid V Vladimirov, thank you so much for this explanation.

Both are harmful. The problem is of the inability to be critical without getting personal. That is the source of problems.

Excellent answer by dear Dr. Emmanuel Vijayanand Murray. Thank you so much for this valuable addition.

The researcher must have scientific humility and away from vanity

Inferiority complex is worse

Superiority is worse than inferiority complex

The reason for the deterioration of the scientific level and the reluctance of researchers is due to corrupt governments, misguided policies, mismanagement of the Ministries of Higher Education and Scientific Research, and the lack of suitable atmosphere and a decent life for researchers and academics.

Totally agree with dr.@dhyaa Because in our country there is no support for scientific research

Don’t know exactly but people always try to degrade good researchers ..

Hi dear researcher, Inferiority has the most effect on the degradation of scientific level of researchers

Good question, follow that.

While inferority complex (a key concept in Adler's Individual Psychology) really exists, there is no complex called superiority complex. It is rather one of the expressions or outlets of inferiority complex, or more precisely a defence mechanism to conceal inferiority complex. In no sense it can be equated with high self-esteem, for instance. Wikipedia correctly defines it as "a psychological defense mechanism that compensates for an inferiority complex."

Definitely, the superiority complex has the most dangerous effect on the development of scientific research.

I personally believe that both of them can be detrimental to the development of scientific research simply because they are rooted in the individual's subjectivity. Scientific research should be free from all sources of subjectivity.

Dear Dr. Ali. Jaafar .. thank you for comment.

Спасибо за комплимент.

In my opinion both.....depending upon the situation to express, importance to make the findings widely accessible and focussing the interpretation of the research findings towards benefiting our world holistically.

Both are, of course, having their own merits and demerits.

Definitely, the inferiority complex is more damaging and superiority complex lead to nowhere. However, inferiority complex is not common and can be changed with mentoring and proper advice. Superiority complex can sometime damage the very juniors and may also alienate from the peers. Both the complexes are self-created.

Follow

In my opinion, selfishness and jealousy are important reasons.

With the best wishes

Mr Rezaei Ahvanooei.

I guess these are two extremes and pendulum should stick between the two. Situation management and personalized approach are the best out of any medical and non-medical situation and i term it as " to be the situational manager' DO NOT ASSUME in advance or remorse in retrospect. patients are AFTER ALL patients, and need dignity. But firmness in decision making and guiding you through difficult cases is also needed some add on confidence.

Admit where u lag in understanding and show a little degree of confidence (not preferring the word complex here) in handling conditions where your suety level crosses the significant p-value.

This should and will make your life simple. So i guess this is no question to me. Anyway it generated a pretty good debate.

Regards

Dear Dr. Sikandar Hayat Khan.

Thank you so much for your valuable addition, I fully agree with.

Regards

Overwork.

I think it really depend on where you are talking about. In Africa and other developing economies, an inferiority complex catalyzed by poor infrastructure and output may affect scientific level of researchers. This may not be the same for others in developed economies.

Non-recognition of the findings to researchers

Lack of adequate laboratories.

Great contributions!

Superiority complex is more visible. The others keep low profile. I think it is easier to recover from inferiority complex than from superiority complex.

we have only two options, so I select the latter one

Albert Einstein > Quotes > Quotable Quote

📷

“When the number of factors coming into play in a phenomenological complex is too large scientific method in most cases fails. One need only think of the weather, in which case the prediction even for a few days ahead is impossible.”

― Albert Einstein

Fully agreed with most of the above mentioned posts.

Superiorty complex!

I think that the environment has an important role in forming the personality of the researcher or academic. When the environment does include groups of individuals who have a High Performance Culture and Culture of Prevention, there will be researchers with a spirit of cooperation and humility.

Best regards

Dear all,

Georg Hegel is the predecessor of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin

There is an apocryphal story that, when Hegel was lecturing on the philosophy of history, a history student in the class interrupted to say, 'But Herr Professor, the facts are different,' to which Hegel, unruffled, replied, 'So much the worse for the facts.'

• Andrew Collier, Marx: A Beginner's Guide (2008), Ch. 8

Best regards,

Konstantin M. Golubev

"Degradation of scientific level of researchers" reminds me of the myth of "Global Warming" actively discussed in the RG.

Both have an impact on the deterioration of the scientific level of researchers, but the inferiority complex has the greatest impact

Dear all,

Very nice answers were provided by my RG-colleagues. Thanks a lot for these best inputs. I appreciate them.

Best regards

Hamid

Superiority complex is more dangerous since the person with that attitude is likely to be a bully, not listen to others and hold on to ideas steadfastly even if they have been proved to be wrong.