Short implants are designed for use in atrophic jaws. However, the use of short implants in a wide range should be considered. Classic 2D FEA studies by Stig Hansson (1999, 2000 and 2003) showed the possibility of bone preservation when conical top implants were used. Except for the risk of peri-implantitis, would you consider the use of short implants a new trend?
Yes Dr. I do consider using short implants (7mm length) as new trend, since it saves lot of hassle and cost to the patient who otherwise would have required sinus lift or nerve repositioning. Instead use a short implant (with wide diameter to compensate for the surface area).
For the reasons mentioned above, the included studies are partially comparable. However some final considerations can be drawn. • The concepts of locking taper and platform switching have proven useful in preserving peri-implant bone tissue. • The success of a short implant is not influenced by the insertion position rather than the quality of the recipient bone. • The implant’s ability to transmit bone forces is crucial in achieving stable and functional osseointegration. In conclusion new and detailed studies are recommended in order to state with the reliability of short implants. In particular, univocal terms are recommended and a main attention on the quality aspect of treatment is required.
- Badges
- Science topic