I am writing to share my experience after a recent submission to the International Journal of Children's Spirituality (published by Taylor & Francis). I believe in transparent discourse about the publication process to help other researchers make informed decisions.

Timeline Summary:

  • 2022: Original submission.
  • Feb 2023: Received a "Reject and Resubmit" decision.
  • May 2023: Submitted a fully revised manuscript.
  • 2023-2025: Endured multiple long delays (6-12 months between rounds), with the editorial office citing perpetual difficulty in finding reviewers. I provided a list of potential reviewers in Dec 2023 to assist.
  • Aug 2025: Received a request for minor revisions ("generally favourable" reviews).
  • Sep 2025: Received a final rejection.

Assessment:

  • Strength: The peer review itself, when it eventually happened, was thorough. The reviewers and editor were attentive to detail and their comments were valuable for strengthening the paper's evidence base.
  • Critical Weakness: The editorial management was, in my experience, unacceptable. The three-year timeline, lack of proactive communication, and constant delays represent a significant failure in the journal's duty to its authors. The investment of time and effort required far exceeded what any author should reasonably expect.

Conclusion: While the goal of rigorous review is commendable, the process must be efficient and respectful of an author's time. This was not my experience. I share this not out of bitterness—the paper is much improved and will be submitted elsewhere—but as a data point for other researchers considering this journal. Please factor in potential handling times when choosing an outlet for your work.

More Hadi Ghasemi's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions