Developing countries may have a relatively higher level of conspicuous consumption, because of extreme inequalities in income. The relatively frequent appearance of such a behavior in the Balkans in general, seems to confirm this idea. Thus, it sounds particularly fascinating to investigate reasons, factors and other aspects concerning this behavior. This may help to better understand the coexistence of the impossibility to fulfill sometimes even the basic needs and the insistence to buy extremely expensive products simply to show off, on the other side.
Pollet & Thienpont manage to show that conspicuous consumption has its roots in sexual selection, following Darwin’s arguments and contrasting Veblen who stated that natural selection is unable to explain the persistence of “wasteful” behavior. They trace the origins of the phenomenon back to the theory of sexual selection, more particularly to the handicap principle.
Conspicuous consumption is essentially an instrument of signaling. Individuals use it to signal sexual or social relevant characteristics to others. It can also be a matter of self fulfillment or just serve as a means to fill social voids. It is because of this, that marginal groups spend relatively more on conspicuous consumption. Higher levels of education should generally bring higher levels of such consumption, due to a higher access to financial resource and social relevant characteristics
thanks for this - first - answer! i agree, i also treat conspicuous consumption from an evolutionary point of view (costly signalling, handicap principle, sexual selection). i was just wondering if there are other scales (for use in questionnaires) than those two i already found.
Hi Manfred, Depending on your purpose and extent of usage, there is a short and relatively simple scale proposed by Souiden et al (2011), although again, it is not very extensive. Podoshen et al (2011) employed another relatively short scale adopted (with modifications) from a previous study. I must add that I haven't yet used these scales myself, so cannot attest to their validity. I often find myself in a similar struggle when searching for validated surveys; my area concerns a more general view of compensatory consumption, but even so, scales are scarce.
You might take a look at "the Handbook of Marketing Scales." Now, I just looked and did not see a scale related to conspicuous consumption per se, but you may find other scales which may inspire items for a new scale.
one doctoral student (M.H. Moawa, 2007) used Estman et al scale, studying conspicuous consumption in Lebanon, and the effect of religion. The scale was used in the english version and worked fine.
May be you can locate her work through internet... I have only the paper version of the thesis.
While it is not a validated through the standard method, have you seen O'Cass and Frost (2004) and Truong et al. (2008). It has been used in numerous other studies.
O’Cass, A., & Frost, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39.
Truong, Y., Simmons, G., McColl, R. and Kitchen, P.J. (2008), “Status and conspicuousness – are they related? Strategic marketing implications for luxury brands”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 189-203.
You can find a developed scale for measuring conspicuous consumption in this paper (Appendix 3):
Marcoux et al (1997), "The Attitudes Underlying Preferences of Young Urban Educated Polish Consumers Towards Products Made in Western Countries", Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9 (4), 5-29.
But i am not familiar with the scale that developed by Chaudhuri et al. 2011. Could you please give me the title of paper?