Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals.

Festing MF1, Altman DG.

Abstract

For ethical and economic reasons, it is important to design animal experiments well, to analyze the data correctly, and to use the minimum number of animals necessary to achieve the scientific objectives---but not so few as to miss biologically important effects or require unnecessary repetition of experiments. Investigators are urged to consult a statistician at the design stage and are reminded that no experiment should ever be started without a clear idea of how the resulting data are to be analyzed. These guidelines are provided to help biomedical research workers perform their experiments efficiently and analyze their results so that they can extract all useful information from the resulting data. Among the topics discussed are the varying purposes of experiments (e.g., exploratory vs. confirmatory); the experimental unit; the necessity of recording full experimental details (e.g., species, sex, age, microbiological status, strain and source of animals, and husbandry conditions); assigning experimental units to treatments using randomization; other aspects of the experiment (e.g., timing of measurements); using formal experimental designs (e.g., completely randomized and randomized block); estimating the size of the experiment using power and sample size calculations; screening raw data for obvious errors; using the t-test or analysis of variance for parametric analysis; and effective design of graphical data.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12391400

Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals.

Festing MF1, Altman DG.

Abstract

For ethical and economic reasons, it is important to design animal experiments well, to analyze the data correctly, and to use the minimum number of animals necessary to achieve the scientific objectives---but not so few as to miss biologically important effects or require unnecessary repetition of experiments. Investigators are urged to consult a statistician at the design stage and are reminded that no experiment should ever be started without a clear idea of how the resulting data are to be analyzed. These guidelines are provided to help biomedical research workers perform their experiments efficiently and analyze their results so that they can extract all useful information from the resulting data. Among the topics discussed are the varying purposes of experiments (e.g., exploratory vs. confirmatory); the experimental unit; the necessity of recording full experimental details (e.g., species, sex, age, microbiological status, strain and source of animals, and husbandry conditions); assigning experimental units to treatments using randomization; other aspects of the experiment (e.g., timing of measurements); using formal experimental designs (e.g., completely randomized and randomized block); estimating the size of the experiment using power and sample size calculations; screening raw data for obvious errors; using the t-test or analysis of variance for parametric analysis; and effective design of graphical data.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12391400

The links may be helpful to you.

Good Luck

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0098856

http://www.sullydog.com/sullysites/labsite/SOPs/randomization.pdf

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v510/n7503/full/510035a.html

Abstract

Experiments involving neonates should follow the same basic principles as most other experiments. They should be unbiased, be powerful, have a good range of applicability, not be excessively complex, and be statistically analyzable to show the range of uncertainty in the conclusions. However, investigation of growth and development in neonatal multiparous animals poses special problems associated with the choice of “experimental unit” and differences between litters: the “litter effect.” Two main types of experiments are described, with recommendations regarding their design and statistical analysis: First, the “between litter design” is used when females or whole litters are assigned to a treatment group. In this case the litter, rather than the individuals within a litter, is the experimental unit and should be the unit for the statistical analysis. Measurements made on individual neonatal animals need to be combined within each litter. Counting each neonate as a separate observation may lead to incorrect conclusions. The number of observations for each outcome (“n”) is based on the number of treated females or whole litters. Where litter sizes vary, it may be necessary to use a weighted statistical analysis because means based on more observations are more reliable than those based on a few observations. Second, the more powerful “within-litter design” is used when neonates can be  individually assigned to treatment groups so that individuals within a litter can have different treatments. In this case, the individual neonate is the experimental unit, and “n” is based on the number of individual pups, not on the number of whole litters. However, variation in litter size means that it may be difficult to perform balanced experiments with equal numbers of animals in each treatment group within each litter. This increases the complexity of the statistical analysis. A numerical example using a general linear model analysis of variance is provided in the Appendix. The use of isogenic strains should be considered in neonatal research. These strains are like immortal clones of genetically identical individuals (i.e., they are uniform, stable, and repeatable), and their use should result in more powerful experiments. Inbred females mated to males of a different inbred strain will produce F1 hybrid offspring that will be uniform, vigorous, and genetically identical. Different strains may develop at different rates and respond differently to experimental treatments.

How about the Federer formula for amount in each group numbers?