"The result shows absence of intragenomic variation among 16S rDNA gene and presence of variable regions among the 16S rDNA sequences (intergenomic variation), noticing for example high variability around 800, 900, and 1000 bp and a large conserved region between 1150 and 1350 bp. This information allowed us to discard the restriction enzymes FnuII, AsuI, FokI, Eco57I that recognized some restriction sites contained within variable regions, since they are more susceptible of acquiring future nucleotidic variations and with this, the potential generation of different band patterns." [1]

I add that the article mentioned that these discarded enzymes were targeting conserved sites in the study species.

[1]Mandakovic D, Glasner B, Maldonado J, Aravena P, González M, Cambiazo V, Pulgar R. Genomic-Based Restriction Enzyme Selection for Specific Detection of Piscirickettsia salmonis by 16S rDNA PCR-RFLP. Front Microbiol. 2016 May 9;7:643. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00643. PMID: 27242682; PMCID: PMC4860512.

Is my reading right that the article implies that there is such potential? If yes, what are the possible mechanisms?

More important, what's the time frame of this "future nucleotidic variation", is it an evolutionary time frame that could take thousands of years?

Edit: i think my question can be thought of as: How common are new 16s rRNA gene variants in bacterial species?

More Mahmoud Gharieb's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions