If I do research in similar topic and cite my first publication in second. Is it self plagiarism? My study sample is different in the first and second. Are there any specific criteria to consider for self plagiarism? Kindly answer my concern.
yes some journals can consider this as self plagiarism: it already happens in a publication I had submitted
Greeting
Yes. Citation of your previous research acknowledged again in another research without change of findings. Better way to formulate new findings or extend the previous finding in a new scenario.
Dear Ms Shova Shrestha,
In brief, Not to cite own work in another article by same author is self-plagiarism.
I hope similar types of question asked in RG will be useful.
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Does_frequently_citing_own_paper_is_also_plagiarism
If it is self plagiarism, then at least 30 -40% of published articles are having self plagiarism.
Every research article contain a very small part of other related articles. These articles are referred and details of such articles are given in the reference section.
If required, reference of previous related publication of the author may be added with the article.
It is not plagiarism. Plagiarism is stealing of intellectual property.
It is totally normal.
Thanks.
Thank you all for your suggestions.
From the above suggestions: Shall I conclude that, if I cite my work, it will not be considered as self plagiarism?
If you are making meaningful contributions, then I don't see any problem. Most scholars rely on their previous work to publish new articles.
Since you provide enough documentation like quoting from any source, it is not self plagiarism.
I don't think that there is something called self plagiarism, it is already plagiarism even from your own work. If you write two papers, each one should be unique and controlled by the citation roles in any other paper for you or for others.Therefore, if you want to cite from any reference even form you, you should consider yourself any anyone else. As well, please don't forget the copyright of your own work is for the publisher not you, so both of you and the publisher will benefit from this citation.
My regards
Self-plagiarism is the reuse of one's own previously written work in another piece of work without including reference to the previous use. Basically, writers need to let readers know that the text was previously used -- perhaps submitted as a school paper, a journal article, a blog post or other public viewing -- by properly citing those outlets.
Self-plagiarism may also be called "data fragmentation" or "salami slicing," which occurs when the author of a study separates parts of her or her study and publishes it in more than one publication.
Read More about Self-Plagiarism (WriteCheck Writing Center)
Self plagiarism is using your own previous published works without properly citing them. You can't even copy your own sentence from your published paper. But can express the basic idea in a different wordings. There is no meaning in publishing again the already published ideas. So it is better to add references to previous works where ever necessary.
Self-plagiarism is also a academic dishonesty like plagiarism that one has repeat previous idea again and again should avoid as good researcher.
Dr. Mabberley is publishing new editions of the PLANT BOOK at regular intervals with latest updates only. Can you call this as Self plagiarism? No way. This is a vague term in my opinion.
If self article is treated impartially like other articles and proper referencing is performed, there may be no such term as 'self plagiarism'.
Thanks.
I think one need to make reference of own article also same way as other article.Content as such need not be repeated.
Copy from your existing work without reframing or re modify the statement is known as plagiarism.
As long as you acknowledge (cite) yourself, then it is not self plagirism
In my opinion, Extracting your own view from your previous article or other articles is not considered as a self-plagiarism, even citing your own article in your future articles is also not a self-plagiarism.
Regards
Dr. Kamath Madhusudhana
What was wrong with the first study that forced you to repeat your study in a second population? It may be interesting for a second researcher to repeat your study in a second research population, e.g., in a new country, in the hands of new researchers, in a new culture. Otherwise why play games?
https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2018/07/03/new-article-self-plagiarism-research-in-the-social-sciences-a-scoping-review/
Dear Dennis,
It not like that. Dr. Mabberley is constantly updating his work. What is possible for him is difficult for others.
Dear Shovana Shrestha, I have seen this kinds of problem is common in nursing students and in some public health and other faculty students as well. They want to use the same topic but with different population. Theoretically, it can be done. But we need to suggest the way of measurement of dependent variable.
Dear Shovana Shrestha,
In my opinion, it is not self plagiarism.
Please also have a look at these useful RG links.
https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_ethical_is_self-plagiarism
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_it_fair_to_cite_your_own_previous_work_when_publishing_a_paper
Good luck!
It is not self-plagiarism if you have ensured that the findings from the same study are of novelty and you have properly cited all related studies mentioned in the new study.
Self plagiarism is the similarity of two researches to the same author. This problem may occur if the same research is checked in one of the Plagiarism checker program of after publication
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication