After COVID-19, several researchers are using nanomaterials to fabricate the antiviral/antibacterial masks. The use of nanomaterials can even harm more than viruses or bacterias. Leaching out of nanomaterials through skin contact and inhalation during respiration can severely damage human health. Before COVID-19, antiviral masks were developed by a Japanese company, in which they incorporated the Ag-nano-particles grown on micro-sized fumed silica. Ag-modified silica particles were then dispersed in the polymer matrix, which is electrospun to get a highly breathable membrane. Such membrane/fabric structure provides physical blockage of the virus, along with its rapid degradation by exposed Ag@silica composite. This membrane is used on the outer side of the mask, so that leaching in the skin can be avoided. In addition, there is back support of the additional nano-fibers film to avoid the inhalation through respiration. Alongside, the micro-support of silica and its embedding in polymer makes it almost impossible to pollute the environment. Despite this much safety, such an antiviral mask idea is not implemented in many countries, for example, South Korea.
Additionally, the cost of such masks is a big concern..... as electrospinning has limited productivity. similarly, the cost of nano-materials itself is a bottleneck at gram scale.
Safety concerns of nanomaterials should be ensured before the launch of any product. The mechanism of N95 mask is still the best and most guaranteed for the protective applications.
In addition, I would like to suggest if someone wants to explore the nano-materials for the mask, then materials like Activated charcoal (AC) etc can be used. It is biocompatible and antiviral activity is due to high surface charge, same as N95 mask. most importantly, it is an extremely low-cost and sustainable material.
Please suggest further recommendations, if you are from a similar area.
Best Regards
Mumtaz Ali