May be these links will be useful:

citation (references link with iso 17244)

AFNOR XP T90-382, 2009. Qualité de l'eau - Bio indicateur de la toxicité potentielle de milieux aqueux - Détermination de la toxicité potentielle d'échantillons aqueux sur le développement embryo-larvaire de bivalve. p. 19.

[2]

Standard methods for the examination of waters and wastewaters. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., Fifteenth Edition, 1980, p. 301.

[3]

ASTM 1994. Standard guide for conducting static acute toxicity tests starting with embryos of four species of saltwater bivalve molluscs. Annual book of standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Vol 11.05, pp. 223-240.

[4]

R., Beiras, E. HIS Effects of dissolved mercury on embryogenesis, survival, growth and metamorphosis of Crassostrea gigas oyster larvae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1994, 113 pp. 95–103.

[5]

P.M. Chapman, E.R. Long The use of bioassays as part of a comprehensive approach to marine pollution assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1983, 14 pp. 81–84.

[6]

G. Damiens, E. His, M. Gnassia-Barelli, F. Quiniou, M. Roméo Evaluation of biomarkers in oyster larvae in natural and polluted conditions. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2004, 138 (part C) pp. 121–128.

[7]

Environment Agency (UK). The direct toxicity assessment of aqueous environmental samples using the oyster (Crassostrea gigas) embryo-larval development test. Methods for the Examination of Waters and Associated Materials, 2007.

[8]

O. Geffard 2001. Toxicité potentielle des sédiments marins et estuariens contaminés : évaluation chimique et biologique, biodisponibilité des contaminants sédimentaires. Thèse Univ-Bordeaux 1, spécialité écotoxicologie, p. 351.

[9]

E. His 1991. Biologie et écotoxicologie des véligères de Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg) dans le bassin d’Arcachon. Thèse de docteur d’Etat ès Sciences, Univ. Bordeaux 1, 192 p + vol. annexes.

[10]

E. His, R. Robert Le danger des traitements par le sulfate de cuivre en zone conchylicole: toxicité vis à vis des oeufs et des jeunes larves de C. gigas. Rev. Trav. Inst. Peche Marit. 1982, 42 (2) pp. 117–125.

[11]

E. His, I. Heywang, O. Geffard, X. De Montaudoin A comparison between oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) larval bioassay for toxicological studies. Water Res. 1999, 33 pp. 1706–1718.

[12]

E. His, M. Seaman 1993. Effects of twelve pesticides on larvae of oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and two species of unicellular algae (Isochrysis galbana and Chaetoceros calcitrans). Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer, Mar. Envir. Qual. Committee, CM 1993/E: 22, p. 8.

[13]

E. His, M.N. Seaman, R. Beiras A simplification of the bivalve embryogenesis larval development bioassay method for water quality assessment. Water Res. 1997, 31 pp. 351–355.

[14]

ICES, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 2003. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment, 2003. ICES Cooperative Research Report, Copenhagen, 16‑20 June 2003.

[15]

S.Y. Kim, T.Y. Lee 1988. The effects of pollutants effluent from a steam-power plant on coastal bivalves. Ocean research, 10 (1), pp. 47-65.

[16]

P. Lassus, G. Bogé, P. Gentien, R. Loarer, G. Pagano, F. Quiniou 1990. Toxicité des rejets urbains. La mer et les rejets urbains, Bendor, 13-15 juin 1990, Actes de colloques 11, pp. 171-185.

[17]

LIBRALATO G., LOSSO, C., AVEZZU, F., VOLPI GHIRARDINI, A. Influence of salinity adjustment methods, salts and brine, on the toxicity of wastewater samples to mussels embryos. Environ. Technol. 2009, 30 (1) pp. 85–91.

[18]

F.R. Lillies Studies on fertilization x. The effects of copper salts on the fertilization reaction in Arbacia and a comparison on mercury effects. Biol. Bull. 1921, 41 pp. 121–143.

https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:17244:ed-1:v1:en

Dear Khouloud BOUKADIDA,

I would recommend you to directly refer to standard EPA documents for reference. Most of the journal articles do not accept journal references owing to the ambiguity that arises out of their prescribed tolerable limits. Remember the fact that, the tolerable limits are application specific. Most of the US EPA documents are freely available online.

Refer to these online documents:

https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/final_local_limits_guidance.pdf

https://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations

My Best Wishes...

I agree with Mikhail further read the following article

 Dear   Khouloud BOUKADIDA 

Please follow the 

standard EPA documents

and also the best references which dear Mikhail reffered.

Best Regards

Parisa Ziarati

I agree with other colleagues

you should follow the USEPA guidelines,

all the best

USEPA guidelines are good, but if you can`t find the particular one you can go for a peer reviewed article as suggested in the above list