The pseudo-scientist and anti-relativist Mohammad Shafik Khan proposed an open challenge, which can be found here: Poster OPEN CHALLENGE
Here is attached my response to his challenge.
Now is my turn: I challenge him to point out a single mistake in my rigorous derivation of the Lorentz transformation that he is criticizing: https://youtu.be/6N2mH3-khUg
Let us all admire how he is going to flee.
P.S. 1: Claiming that the 2nd postulate is "wrong" is not acceptable, since it is an experimental fact and, as a result, there is nothing you can do against it.
P.S. 2: For those who are curious about the character, his biography is available on my website, here: https://bluemoonshine.fun/Project-Pseudo-Scientists-MohammadShafikKhan.php
VG
The open challenge based on papers published in peer-reviewed journals requires a paper published in peer-reviewed journal by the acceptors of the open challenge.
Your nonsense does not require a look not to speak of reading. Go on making nonsense I am enjoying your stupidity.
VG
For an example read the rebuttals in my profile there are two rebuttals.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "The open challenge based on papers published in peer-reviewed journals requires a paper published in peer-reviewed journal by the acceptors of the open challenge."
No, it doesn't since your challenge has not been peer-reviewed and published! You lost! Additionally, as expected, you are cowardly fleeing from my challenge.
VG
I cannot go on replying the nonsense. The rebuttal should falsify my papers which are published in peer-reviewed journals that could be done only by publishing the rebuttal in a peer-reviewed journal. There is not a single experimental evidence of contraction of space in the direction of motion till today which SR predicts.
VG
I do see you as a fish out of water and you can't do anything about my open challenge by your actions on ResearchGate. If anything could be done that has to be done in the peer-reviewed journals.
VG
You have not understood even spellings of my name one can imagine how much you must have understood the open challenge. Produce one experiment of contraction of space in the direction of motion of the observer as predicted by the SR I will stop claiming to have put forward the open challenge.
> "There is not a single experimental evidence of contraction of space in the direction of motion till today which SR predicts."
If you knew anything about what you're trying to talk about, you would know that not only do the muons that are observed at the surface of the Earth confirm the reality of time dilation, but they also confirm the reality of length contraction.
> "you can't do anything about my open challenge by your actions on ResearchGate"
As a reminder, your stupid "open challenge" is debunked in this original post.
> "If anything could be done that has to be done in the peer-reviewed journals"
Your challenge is posted on your ResearchGate profile, and has not been peer-reviewed.
Besides, you are still cowardly fleeing from my challenge!
CG
Go on day dreaming. Open challenge says that papers are to be shown to be incorrect.
CG
The muon detection on earth is actually the confirmation of the time dilation but not space contraction.
VG
Space has been shown to be filled up with aether as such the question of contraction of space does not arise.
VG
Yes; reply to your challenge is in the form paper titled Rebuttal to Lann N. Ramez........which is available in my profile.
Your challenge and my reply drama is over. You got to produce a rebuttal of papers titled 'Experimental and Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe' and 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies By Albert Einstein is Based on Trickeries..... 'that is the challenge.
Have a read of the following passage.
Kindly send this information to every office bearer of Nobel prize for physics and Physiology & medicine so that they cannot say afterwards that they did not know about this. Once Nobel prize is deservingly given to the discovery of aether that will be the end of Big Bang Theory the foundation of atheistic main-stream physics. Acceptance of discovery of aether, proved without any doubt whatsoever, will be beginning of theistic physics. I don't care whether they give me the Nobel prize or not but they should accept the truth for denying the truth knowingly they have to kill their conscience for which they will be answerable before God. Their conscience will curse the nominators and selectors of Nobel prize for physics for not giving the prize to the discoverer of the aether throughout their life though ultimately the discovery of aether will have to be awarded the Nobel prize. Let the Nobel prize organisation be truthful and if this will not awaken the conscience of the nominators and selectors then nothing can. I do realise the problem of Nobel prize organisations because all the nominators will have to be from the main-stream physics who do not want to know anything about what dissident physicists say or write. I being the dissident physicist so all the nominators would not like to include me in the list. For this hurdle I have the rational solution which is that those nominators be selected who accept my 'open challenge' and prove me wrong. It is worthwhile to mention here that I have put forward an open challenge to the adopted paradigm of physics i.e. main-stream physics in 2012 which is standing till today.
Following is the link to my publications including my open challenge
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Khan-516/research
(Please also share this link with every university and science college of the world including research institutions of the world like NASA, ESA, CERN, FERMILAB etc.)
After the discovery of the existence of aether, the electric dipoles & fifth constituent of universe, in the year 2011 and putting forward the open challenge in 2012 to the adopted paradigm of physics I thought the prestigious Nobel prize Organisation will realise the importance of my discovery some day. But I waited for thirteen years but nothing happened though the open challenge continues to be standing till date. I did approach my government, wherein pathetic conditions prevail so far as education and science & technology are concerned, and there also nothing happened. Now I have decided to claim the Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine as a matter of right.
I want that all the professionals should recommend me for award of Nobel prizes in physics and Physiology & medicine for following discoveries and scientific research.
1. Discovery of aether, the electric dipoles as fifth constituent of the universe, without any doubt whatsoever in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled "Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' and substantiated by my several published papers.
2. Consequent upon discovery of aether, the electric dipoles, light/radiation has been shown to be the electromagnetic wave motion propagating in the electric dipoles of aether. Also consequent upon the discovery of aether all the four forces of nature are reduced to one force i. e. electromagnetic force in the scientific research paper titled 'Foundation of Theory of Everything; Non-living Things and Living Things'.
3. The Special Theory of Relativity, General Theory of Relativity, Minkowski geometry, Space-time Concept, Dark Matter and Dark Energy including the famous formula E=mc^2 are shown to be absolutely baseless in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled 'Experimental and Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe' This paper also substantiates the existence of aether theoretically and experimentally.
4. A correct and flawless theory of cosmology has been proposed and published in the peer-reviewed journal titled 'Energy Theory of Matter and Cosmology'
5. A different paradigm of biological sciences has been proposed and published in the paper titled 'Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life' of which the revised version is under process wherein a metaphysical substance has been introduced, given the name of 'energy', which explains the consciousness, instincts, gowth, self-repair, cell function but above all biological laws This is the only alternative to explain the above-mentioned phenomena of life in all animal species including humans by reviving vitalism and called Revitalism. The laws of nature having been reduced to one electromagnetic force can in no case explain all phenomena of life.
The above-mentioned papers and other papers are available on journal site of Indian Journal of Science and Technology, General Science Journal, Natural Philosophers Database , ResearchGate, SlideShare, viXra, Elixir Online Publishing journal, Academia.edu etc in my profile.
On the basis of above-mentioned work I feel it is my right to claim the Nobel prizes as the adopted paradigm of physics is under open challenge which is standing since 2012 and it has been defended against several attempts of trying to disprove me.
With Regards
Mohammad Shafiq Khan (IFS)
M.Sc (physics) M.Sc (forestry)
Ex. Director, Writer, Scientist, Philosopher and above all a Philanthropist.
Note:- This may also be sent to all those who are concerned with nomination and selection of Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine. Please find out their emails or pages on Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, twitter, LinkedIn etc. and send them this post.
VG
Another reply to you is that ask ChatGPT the question.
Is Einstein's Theory of relativity wrong, yes or no?
And see the reply, it is 'yes' then go on fighting with Chatgpt.
VG
Go on doing such like things it will make me famous and reads of my papers will increase.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "The muon detection on earth is actually the confirmation of the time dilation but not space contraction."
Wow! An anti-relativist who finally admits that time dilation is a real thing! We don't see that everyday!
> "Space has been shown to be filled up with aether"
Ah, excellent, please bottle me a liter of this aether. My lab keeps running out of vacuum.
> "ask ChatGPT the question. Is Einstein's Theory of relativity wrong, yes or no?"
See attached screenshot of ChatGPT's response.
VG
I do not deny time dilation but what I deny is contraction of space and dependence of time on space. This means you have not gone through my papers and claim that my challenge is debunked. You should be ashamed of your actions. But go on making my open challenge known to all the members of ResearchGate.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "I do not deny time dilation but what I deny is contraction of space and dependence of time on space."
Special Relativity has never claimed that time depends on space. What it claims is that time (and length) depends on the frame in which it is measured. This illustrates, again, the fact that you have absolutely no clue of what you are trying to talk about.
Regarding your challenge to prove length contraction, it is very easy, you can even do it at home: Take two parallel wires, neutral at rest. Run a current through them in the same direction, they remain neutral, yet they attract. This attraction has been measured countless times. The only way to explain it consistently is through length contraction. Deny length contraction, and you must deny the existence of magnetism itself.
Checkmate!
I also note that you are still cowardly fleeing from my challenge.
VG
Why are you making a mockery of science. The wires carrying current and contraction of space horrible.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "Why are you making a mockery of science. The wires carrying current and contraction of space horrible."
That's it? That's your "scientific" argument?
VG
Go on with your nonsense as it will make me known to the members of the ResearchGate.
> "Go on with your nonsense as it will make me known to the members of the ResearchGate."
Don't worry, your crackpottery is well-known!
VG
Spread the following passage also.
Kindly send this information to every office bearer of Nobel prize for physics and Physiology & medicine so that they cannot say afterwards that they did not know about this. Once Nobel prize is deservingly given to the discovery of aether that will be the end of Big Bang Theory the foundation of atheistic main-stream physics. Acceptance of discovery of aether, proved without any doubt whatsoever, will be beginning of theistic physics. I don't care whether they give me the Nobel prize or not but they should accept the truth for denying the truth knowingly they have to kill their conscience for which they will be answerable before God. Their conscience will curse the nominators and selectors of Nobel prize for physics for not giving the prize to the discoverer of the aether throughout their life though ultimately the discovery of aether will have to be awarded the Nobel prize. Let the Nobel prize organisation be truthful and if this will not awaken the conscience of the nominators and selectors then nothing can. I do realise the problem of Nobel prize organisations because all the nominators will have to be from the main-stream physics who do not want to know anything about what dissident physicists say or write. I being the dissident physicist so all the nominators would not like to include me in the list. For this hurdle I have the rational solution which is that those nominators be selected who accept my 'open challenge' and prove me wrong. It is worthwhile to mention here that I have put forward an open challenge to the adopted paradigm of physics i.e. main-stream physics in 2012 which is standing till today.
Following is the link to my publications including my open challenge
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Khan-516/research
(Please also share this link with every university and science college of the world including research institutions of the world like NASA, ESA, CERN, FERMILAB etc.)
After the discovery of the existence of aether, the electric dipoles & fifth constituent of universe, in the year 2011 and putting forward the open challenge in 2012 to the adopted paradigm of physics I thought the prestigious Nobel prize Organisation will realise the importance of my discovery some day. But I waited for thirteen years but nothing happened though the open challenge continues to be standing till date. I did approach my government, wherein pathetic conditions prevail so far as education and science & technology are concerned, and there also nothing happened. Now I have decided to claim the Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine as a matter of right.
I want that all the professionals should recommend me for award of Nobel prizes in physics and Physiology & medicine for following discoveries and scientific research.
1. Discovery of aether, the electric dipoles as fifth constituent of the universe, without any doubt whatsoever in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled "Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' and substantiated by my several published papers.
2. Consequent upon discovery of aether, the electric dipoles, light/radiation has been shown to be the electromagnetic wave motion propagating in the electric dipoles of aether. Also consequent upon the discovery of aether all the four forces of nature are reduced to one force i. e. electromagnetic force in the scientific research paper titled 'Foundation of Theory of Everything; Non-living Things and Living Things'.
3. The Special Theory of Relativity, General Theory of Relativity, Minkowski geometry, Space-time Concept, Dark Matter and Dark Energy including the famous formula E=mc^2 are shown to be absolutely baseless in the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled 'Experimental and Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe' This paper also substantiates the existence of aether theoretically and experimentally.
4. A correct and flawless theory of cosmology has been proposed and published in the peer-reviewed journal titled 'Energy Theory of Matter and Cosmology'
5. A different paradigm of biological sciences has been proposed and published in the paper titled 'Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life' of which the revised version is under process wherein a metaphysical substance has been introduced, given the name of 'energy', which explains the consciousness, instincts, gowth, self-repair, cell function but above all biological laws This is the only alternative to explain the above-mentioned phenomena of life in all animal species including humans by reviving vitalism and called Revitalism. The laws of nature having been reduced to one electromagnetic force can in no case explain all phenomena of life.
The above-mentioned papers and other papers are available on journal site of Indian Journal of Science and Technology, General Science Journal, Natural Philosophers Database , ResearchGate, SlideShare, viXra, Elixir Online Publishing journal, Academia.edu etc in my profile.
On the basis of above-mentioned work I feel it is my right to claim the Nobel prizes as the adopted paradigm of physics is under open challenge which is standing since 2012 and it has been defended against several attempts of trying to disprove me.
With Regards
Mohammad Shafiq Khan (IFS)
M.Sc (physics) M.Sc (forestry)
Ex. Director, Writer, Scientist, Philosopher and above all a Philanthropist.
Note:- This may also be sent to all those who are concerned with nomination and selection of Nobel prizes for physics and Physiology & medicine. Please find out their emails or pages on Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, twitter, LinkedIn etc. and send them this post.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "Spread the following passage also."
I'm not going to spam people by flooding them with all your nonsense. If you want to keep making a fool of yourself in front of the entire web by arrogantly claiming that you deserve a Nobel prize because you are supposedly more intelligent than the most brilliant minds of the 20th century (including Einstein, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Bohr, Planck, Dirac, Fermi, Pauli, Feynman, and many others), then do it yourself!
If you want a Nobel prize, why don't you ask for it in your prayers?
VG
Continue criticism on me as this has increased reads of my papers. Increase the nonsense you are writing. Thankyou.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "Continue criticism on me as this has increased reads of my papers. Increase the nonsense you are writing. Thankyou."
And this makes more people laughing at you!
VG
And I have been laughing on you as well. Laughing is good for health.
> "And I have been laughing on you as well. Laughing is good for health."
You can laugh as much as you want: The entire scientific community supports me, nobody supports you. Also, my credential are real, while yours are totally made up.
Believe me, people are laughing at you way more than you are laughing at me.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "LOL. It is good for health."
That's right! Thank you for making us laugh at you!
VG
Let you realise the divinity of Quran by reading the translation of a verse (41-53)
"Soon We shall show you signs in space and what is in their selves then you will realise this (Quran) is true......"
Both aether and 'energy' have been shown in two papers published in peer-reviewed journals. 'Energy' has been shown to be a metaphysical substance responsible for phenomenon of life in living being in the paper titled 'Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life' which is available in my profile.
VG
This verse is to be read with reference to the context and the context is when there is war going on. Read verse (9-6) in reply.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Unfortunately, your book keeps contradicting itself. For example, in the beginning, it says that the book is complete and that any further texts that pretend to complete it would be lies. Thus, if you believe in at least some of the hadiths (which as a muslim you surely do), then you are contradicting the quran.
Also, all the "holy science" in the book turns out to be a bad plagiary of ancient Greek texts (most of it we know nowadays is completely wrong).
VG
Hadith is simply man made and could be wrong where it contradicts the Quran. However Qur'an is the final word from the Creator. Scientific facts are contained in Quran but in the allegories.
@Mohammad Shafiq Khan, your blunder ideas and blabbering will never even touch the robust and rigorous mathematical proof behing GR and Einstein's view. Sorry to say that you are having a misconception about the theory of Relativity from some pseudoscientists.🙏🏼 pls keep away yourself from Relativity textbook for your goof health..
Sarandas Accott
There is an open challenge to the theory of relativity standing since 2012. Several physicists tried but failed. You too can try but mind you the rebuttal paper should be published in a peer-reviewed journal because the open challenge is based on papers published in peer-reviewed journals.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "Several physicists tried but failed."
Quit lying!
VG
Do more of such nonsense it gives rise to spikes in reads of my papers.
Two of rebuttals in my profile is the evidence that people tried and failed.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Why would I publish in a peer-reviewed journal the proof that your non-peer-reviewed and unpublished challenge is ridiculous?
VG
Reply to you is in the two rebuttal papers which you should read in my profile.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
> "Reply to you is in the two rebuttal papers which you should read in my profile."
Perfect. Let me know when they will be peer-reviewed and published.
VG
One of the replies is already published in a peer-reviewed journal.
You reply is baseless and meaningless as it addresses the open challenge but you have to address the papers published in peer-reviewed journals.
The rubbish you have written is nullified by the experimental evidence of absence transverse Doppler effect quoted in the paper titled Experimental and Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of Physical Universe.
VG
The peer-reviewed paper is posted as Another Rebuttal paper which is reply to Jeremy Dunning Davies. Read and do more of nonsense so that my papers are read by more people.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
I'm not gonna dig into your trash. Simply give the reference to the paper, as any real scientist would do.
VG
It the first paper in my profile under the name Another rebuttal paper published in peer-reviewed journals Elixir
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
I am not going to dig into your trash. Properly give the reference to the supposedly peer-reviewed and published paper, as any real scientist would do.
VG
Here is the link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UZo0u9O1BXOvEbcSZfbkhLNdbDLoytbb/view?usp=drivesdk
That is not a reference to a peer reviewed and published paper. It is only a link to download an unpublished PDF. Do you even known what a reference to a published paper is?
Here is one for example:
"Einstein’s cat: a thought experiment on the universality of time dilation"
V G Rousseau
Physics Education, Volume 60, Number 5
Citation V G Rousseau 2025 Phys. Educ. 60 055014
DOI 10.1088/1361-6552/adedf1
VG
Are you mad or what? The is the link to the paper with all the references of journal , pages, year of publication etc. Go to the journal and read it there.
> "The is the link to the paper with all the references of journal"
Giving a link to a Google drive is not how we cite a paper! This proves that you have no clue about real science!
> "Go to the journal and read it there"
How can I go to the journal since you refuse to give the paper's reference?
VG
Why can't you read the paper in my profile. All the details and references are given on top of the paper.
VG
Here is the full reference
www. elixirpublishers.com
(Elixir International Journal)
Elixir Short comm 43(2012) pages. 6694-6695
Elixir comments 44(2012) 7256-7257.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Finally a reference! Now it is clear why you where so reluctant in providing it:
- Many red flags about that "peer-reviewed journal", as pointed out by ChatGpt (see attached screenshot).
- People have already debunked your paper.
VG
Without reading the rebuttal paper you are finding the fault with the journal.
Go on doing the nonsense it increases my reads of publications.
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Keep making a fool of yourself, not only does it increases the reads of my publications, but it also increases the traffic on my website and my YouTube channel, which ultimately makes me earn more money (see attachment).
For reference:
- https://bluemoonshine.fun/Project-Pseudo-Scientists-MohammadShafikKhan.php
- https://youtu.be/6N2mH3-khUg
- https://youtu.be/QFWF90bch3c
- https://youtu.be/Dy8fC2eVOeA
- https://youtu.be/WAoJ21giXMU
- https://youtu.be/PFh_OQMwKmU
- https://youtu.be/nxAPELzc8hc
VG
Go on doing the nonsense. Thanks for being responsible for increasing the reads of my publications.
Keep making a fool of yourself, not only does it increases the reads of my publications, but it also increases the traffic on my website and my YouTube channel, which ultimately makes me earn more money (see attachment).
For reference:
- https://bluemoonshine.fun/Project-Pseudo-Scientists-MohammadShafikKhan.php
- https://youtu.be/6N2mH3-khUg
- https://youtu.be/QFWF90bch3c
- https://youtu.be/Dy8fC2eVOeA
- https://youtu.be/WAoJ21giXMU
- https://youtu.be/PFh_OQMwKmU
- https://youtu.be/nxAPELzc8hc
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Biochemistry
- Biomolecules
- Nucleic Acids
- RNA
- Small RNA
- microRNA