Publishing the raw data of a study would often add many, many pages to a manuscript, causing more expense for the journal, or fewer papers to be published.

Some journals now allow researchers to archive their raw data where the public can see it and reference it from the printed edition.

Upload your dataset to data repository platform that can assign a DOI to it. Then refere to this DOI in your paper.

Here you have an example of my data set:

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209337

There are two popular platforms - Zenodo and Figshare

Michael is correct. In many taxonomic papers extensive list of specimens examined are sometimes not published in the paper. Author (s) provided on request.

Raw data is very lengthy and makes the article long. It's better to publsih raw data as data set and cite it as a reference in the research article.

Hi,

It depends on the type of journal that publishes your results. There are journals that accept "supplementary material" as a separate link in the journal record in the publisher's site. This means that your raw material is sent separately, and added as a separate link. some publishers send the supplementary data to reviewers together with the paper, other publishers accept the supplementary material as is. Sometimes the responsibility to the raw material is that of the author, and sometimes the publisher accepts the responsibility for the raw data link.

Yes madam Avishag Gordon.. I do agree with your comments. Thank you for your response..

graphs are better and more concise ..

Dear it is better to publish in peer reviewed journal.