Millions of peoples are affecting by the war in Ukrainian with Russia ,how to solve the problem peacefully by negociation between the two parties ,to ease not to escalate ,and America should advise Ukranion to negociate peacefully to end the war as the world is burning.How to solve the war peacefully?
It's almost impossible. Russia believes it has a "messianic mission" to conquer and subjugate other territories and nations, beginning with Tsar Ivan the Terrible and ideologically grounded in Peter I's "Testament." period of the 20s of the twentieth century, after the Civil War. My country was "visited" 13 times by Moscow troops between 1711-1958. Throughout history, Russia has distinguished itself by its policy of force, backed by armed power. Today, an additional "argument" is the oil and gas fields it holds, as well as grain production. Internal social, cultural and economic development has never been important to Kremlin leaders ... Aleksandr Dughin describes in his books Russia's geopolitical doctrine and its "mission" to "integrate" all Christian peoples in Eastern Europe into the Russian Empire. How can you negotiate with a power that has always used force as an argument and has rarely complied with signed treaties? Only people who are disappointed in their expectations from the West can believe that Russia could be a good alternative.
Two individual fighters cannot end their fight till one of the death untill and unless referee is not there.
Representative of UN is the right referee who should play vital roll unbiased.
Otherwise authorize India to play a roll of referee. India can give a better solution peacefully.
This war is not caused by Russia at least according to John Mearshemear. It's caused by America and the West through their foreign policy moves to include former USSR states to join NATO. To stop the war peacefully, the West and America needs to stop what they are doing i.e encroaching on Russian borders.
I think the cause of the war in Russia is polar slack. As well as what is known as the rise and fall of the strong. Russia, according to developments, wants to permanently destroy Ukraine. Of course, this is dictated by the Eurasian security theory. On the other hand, there will be no confrontation between the United States. Even if it is. The confrontation will be subject to the criteria of conventional war.
Alhagie, what a peculiar and partial answer, is the same to say that the Malvinas War was caused by Great Britain government
In my opinion, the problem between Russia and the West (I am not writing with the whole world because certain countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Middle East have allied and partnership relations) lies in several aspects. First, not the last role in this context is played by the essence of humanity, which lies in the interests. States are a kind of person who seeks to ensure their economic, political, geostrategic and military interests. In the awareness of the states, while ensuring all these interests, her life will be more stable and safer. But as we see in this race of interests, everyone suffers, including third-party countries not directly involved in the conflict.
That is, the interest of the Western world to ensure its interests in the world for the stability and security of its states and peoples, to a certain extent, is presented by Russia as a threat to its sovereignty, political, military and economic security, and vice versa, the promotion of Russia's interests is perceived as a threat to the interests and values of the Western world.
If we take, for example, Russia's claims that with the collapse of the USSR, the Western world undertook not to pursue a policy of advancing the West to the East; abandon the arms race, by the way, Russia to a certain extent fulfilled these obligations in the early 90s, then we can trace the logic of Russian diplomacy, which asks the question: Why does NATO continue to advance and why the United States withdrew from some treaties on the promotion of ballistic missiles and so on.
On the other hand, one can trace the logic of the Western world, which is trying to justify its behavior with the new realities of the modern world, in which there is a need for the above actions. That is, the emergence of new players in the international system of terrorist organizations, new state organizations, non-Western transnational organizations with great financial capabilities that can influence the international system encourage the Western world, and the United States in particular, to strengthen its influence and strength in all regions of the world. At the same time, this is happening against the background when Europe, as a single player, is losing its political, military and economic significance on the planet.
Given all of the above, it seems to me that the only possible solution to modern problems will be the division of the world through compromise mutual concessions. As history shows, Russia does not deviate from its goals and interests even to its own detriment. And the tense situation in the world and the increasing pressure on Russia can be really fraught with unpredictable consequences from which all of humanity will suffer. Therefore, the entire world community must find a way out of this situation, perhaps by reforming the UN in order to increase its role and influence on world events. For starters, this could be the involvement of new countries from continents not represented in it in the UN Security Council, which will make it possible to better understand the modern world and the differences in it, which will make it possible to hear the voices of all representatives of the planet. This can create a certain balance of power in the world by reducing the influence of the current hegemons in the world, thereby moderating their appetites and desires to achieve their goals by all means.
Throughout history Russia had dictators. Mr. Putin is no different. The decision should come from the people and especially the youth of Russia because a lot of opportunities are now lost due to his greed. The Russian people should get rid of him as a leader.
Russia still thinks it is a super power. It needs to loose in power so much that the stop to think too big of themselves and to accept being a regional power. It will take time but in the end the change will come. Young Russians who dare to make a change, are maybe the solution.
To answer this question, we must first know why Russia did this action? It could be within the ruling Russian mentality that with the possibility of restoring the glories of Tsarist Russia, which can be seen with the presence of a president who rules for life, especially with the absence of any parties opposing this trend. It could also be the Russian fear of the presence of NATO near its borders, especially after the Ukrainian tendency to join the European Union, which Russia is actually afraid of.
Russia feels that they have lost their former allies in Eastern Europe and Asia and their position as a major power in the world. They are fighting to get back their level of influence, but in fact they have done it even worse for themselves by going to war. The only way forward is to find something of a gain to offer Russia on certain premises. Having got some revenue they might be satisfied to stop the war and get an invitation to come back to the international fellowship of nations. But I think this can be possible only after a change of regime in Russia.
Thanks for all friends and researchers ,the crises is still existing but the world absorb it and trying to accomodate for it now ,despite inflation and rise of prices and inflation ,i hope war is ended to safe all human the damage and economic crises.
The Euro-Atlantic world put a geopolitical price tag on Ukraine
The principle of force remains at the heart of international relations
Motives for its use may be different. From the point of view of realpolitik, Russia's motives in this case are just. The current Ukraine is an artificial formation, like most of the modern post-Soviet republics, including Azerbaijan. But this is not about the fact that artificiality does not give the right to life and independence. Again, from the point of view of real politics, all historical constructions are somehow artificial in nature. The categories of "who is older," "who is wiser," and "who deserves more" are useless unless "I can" and "I do" are backed up. Ukraine had 30 years to prove its right to sovereign existence in the geopolitical jungle. But instead of using the human, scientific and industrial infrastructural potential left over from the Soviet Empire and forming its statehood on this basis, Kyiv chose a simpler path - the identity of opposing itself to Russia. The form “I am a titular Orthodox Ukrainian, not an Orthodox Russian” is understandable. Many used such technologies, but the local "elites" did not fill it with content.
The Euro-Atlantic path of development is a form that also lacked content. Why? It is impossible to become a part of this supranational identity by jumping over the stage of forming one's own. You cannot go into the home of self-sufficient Americans, French, Germans, British and Dutch without understanding who you are and what contribution you can make to the family. Such elites will not allow you to be part of their core, but you are always welcome to use your ardent and suicidal desire to prove loyalty. The problem is not that Ukraine wanted to join the EU and NATO, but that it wanted to do it at any cost. And this price was clear from the very beginning - to contain Russia and be a constant threat and irritant for her. Unfortunately, it was not statesmen who were in power in Kyiv, but manipulators-compradors who solved two problems - to maintain power and steal more from the national wealth.
Was Moscow supposed to put up with this from the point of view of the school of realism? No. Nor should the States put up with Soviet missiles in Cuba (which President Kennedy called "our backyard"). Since 2000, Moscow has been proposing to start a multilateral process of developing a new European security architecture, but hears only "we are not conducting dialogues on equal terms with the losers in the Cold War." Immortal rules of realpolitik: if you want to be heard - force it, if you want to be equal - get it. The call to dialogue does not work, only the force that inspires fear works. This is the only way to achieve your goals in realpolitik. The Euro-Atlantic world has placed a geopolitical price tag on Ukraine. How else to explain the fact that no one is in a hurry to fight for a “dear and valuable” colleague who has been promised a place at the family table for decades, but is kept in a room for servants and guests. Russia immediately offered a place at the table in her family, but Ukraine prefers the golden spoons and forks of the euro table. This can be understood, but not constant threats and opposition. Nothing personal, just geopolitics!
This crisis should be a lesson for countries that prefer to become part of other teams at any cost, instead of building their own independent state with their work, intelligence and pragmatism. President George Washington said it best: “A nation that treats another nation with habitual hatred or habitual kindness is, in a way, a slave. Such a nation is a slave to its hostility or its good feelings, either of the two is enough to lead it away from its duty and interests.
The dollar became the world currency due to the fact that at some point all countries began to buy and sell oil for it. The power of the dollar was ensured by the ability of the United States to comprehensively (that is, financial, political and military means) control global energy flows. This became the basis of their world leadership. Gradually, however, the United States began to abuse its power and hegemonic status with increasing force. They decided that they can do everything, and the laws of economics no longer apply to them. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." They openly declared themselves to be an "exceptional nation" and claimed to write the rules but not follow them.
As a result, the United States gradually turned from a global leader into a global parasite, having lost real economic superiority by 2008, and by now, real military-technological superiority. An attempt to maintain its leadership status by increasing information terror and global manipulations (staging) failed. And most importantly, an unspoken principle was violated: the United States ensures the stability of the global financial system, receives a number of bonuses from this, but also gives others a chance to live. The United States has decided that it is not necessary to let live. Simply put, fraera ruined greed.
The system went haywire and ceased to enjoy the trust of many participants in the global market, ceased to be profitable for them. It is beneficial only to the US and some of its satellites. The United States understood this and rushed to save its status as a "leader".
Freezing and possible confiscation of Russia's gold and foreign exchange reserves, an attempt to impose "marginal prices" on Russian oil, the clumsy financial policy of the Biden administration, which collapsed the shares of American energy companies, a recession in the United States, Russia's transition to trading its gas for rubles, expulsion from the Sakhalin-2 project Western companies - all this is clear evidence that the current global energy crisis is simply a derivative of the crisis of the "dollar empire", from the collapse of the global financial system.
Everyone in the world understands this, and countries that have at least partial sovereignty are trying to unite, striving to protect their interests and their assets as much as possible from the upcoming collapse. And the countries deprived of sovereignty dutifully move in the footsteps of the "hegemon", hoping mainly for a miracle. And they give him a loan, knowing full well that he will not return it.
When will this crisis end? Then, when there will be a “recount of assets” in the world, that is, their real (and not fictitious) price will be determined in some new monetary units (perhaps in the same oil, perhaps in gas, perhaps in gold or in some shopping cart). And as soon as there is certainty about the value of this basket, there will be other currencies tied to this basket. The basket will not be financial, but commodity, raw materials.
The recent EU, G7 and NATO summits, the “summit of democracies” showed that the United States, together with its vassals, is resisting the transformation that has begun with all its might, still trying to impose its will on the rest of the world, clinging to the old. The rest of the countries eloquently, albeit cautiously, make it clear that they no longer intend to live in the old coordinate system, where one “exceptional” nation imagined itself to be the messenger of the Almighty on earth and decided that everything was possible for it. It's too unprofitable and humiliating. “The tops cannot – the bottoms don't want”, this is the essence of the situation that has developed in the world today.
There are fewer and fewer instruments of influence in the hands of the United States
The Western world apparently still cannot understand one thing. Today's Russia is not a Gorbachev union of republics and it is not Yeltsin's territory built on a coup, deficit and default.
This is another strong and powerful Russia, and you, Western politicians, need to reconsider not the strategy of the collapse of the Russian Federation, but the attitude towards cooperation with a country that has turned from plundered and humiliated by the West over the past 20 years into a state with a powerful political structure, reorganized tailored to strategic goals, hardened and unbending.
Russia knows how to make friends, and this is the best friend among all countries of the world. Reliable, honest. But, as our President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin rightly noted, if someone wants to take a bite out of the country, they will be left without energy, energy, and will live on “bush legs” until the end of their lives; and GMO food served from a spoon by a neighbor in a large ward.
Learn to be friends with Russia.
There is only one way to end the war (and, after some time, to re-establish the normal situation): withdrawal of all russian forces from all ukrainian territories, execution of war reparations from Russia and punishment of war criminals. No negotiations can help, simply because there is no negotiable target: no normal country or nation can negotiate occupation of its territory, so even if (what is extremely unlikely) Ukrainian authorities and/or people would be ready to commit suicide by accepting anything short of the above-mentioned conditions, this would be not only the end of Ukraine but a tragedy for all the world: the invitation of the notorious bandit to prepare further robberies!
At the beginning of 2018, Russian President Vladimir Putin uttered the famous phrase: "Why do we need such a world if there is no Russia there?" Then it sounded in the context of Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons in response to enemy aggression. However, this statement has a much deeper meaning, reflecting the philosophy and worldview of the President of Russia.
The destruction of our state and our people (as well as other nations) can occur not only as a result of a nuclear strike. The likelihood of such a scenario is minimal. The emergence of nuclear weapons is so far the most effective tool to prevent the Third World War, which would have happened 40-60 years ago.
But in the modern world, in recent decades, globalism, the left-liberal ideology of building a totalitarian concentration camp under the control of the so-called world government, poses a much greater danger to us as a country and a nation. For many years, especially in the 90s and 00s, such theses were considered conspiracy theories and outright nonsense. Moreover, the globalists have done a lot of work to marginalize and bring this idea to the point of absurdity. Along with an absolutely realistic assessment, fictional versions appeared that disavowed the true meaning.
This can be compared with the assessment of Freemasonry in the XVIII-XX centuries. It is now reliably known that for centuries there have been Masonic organizations and secret societies, which included representatives of the highest authorities. It was not uncommon for a situation in which representatives of seemingly warring states entered the same society. All this is documented, and everyone can get acquainted with the relevant information.
As an example, I will cite the lodge of the Grand Orient of France, which has taken root in Russia. The para-Masonic organization "Great Orient of the Peoples of Russia" included Kerensky and a significant part of the deputies of the State Duma, which brought the country to the February Revolution.
Many laughed at the (then) hypothesis about the existence of some globalist elites, calling it a notion of conspiracy theorists. Not realizing that they themselves have become victims of the globalist left-liberal ideology, which implies the destruction of states and peoples. They fell victim to the beautiful picture and marketing, buying into the cheap productions of collective Hollywood. They themselves did not notice how they began to set as their goal the consumption of an increasing and absolutely unnecessary amount of goods and services. The cult of the Golden Calf has led to massive intellectual and moral degradation, to the degeneration of our (and not only) society. Fortunately, Russia has not passed the point of no return, which the European states have left far behind.
February 24, 2022 radically changed the course of history. Theoretically, it can be said that the globalist model of a unipolar world was already disintegrating. This is all true, but the question was how many states and peoples the globalists would drag with them into oblivion. And Russia has almost come to this abyss.
Now all the masks are off. Now things can be called by their proper names without any fear. Putin speaks openly about the existence of globalist elites and what liberalism brings with it:
“These objective processes are counteracted by Western globalist elites, provoking chaos, inciting old and new conflicts, implementing a policy of so-called containment, and in fact, undermining any alternative, sovereign paths of development. Thus, they are trying with all their might to preserve the hegemony and power that is slipping out of their hands, they are trying to keep countries and peoples in the grip of a neo-colonial order. Their hegemony means stagnation for the whole world, for the whole civilization, obscurantism and the abolition of culture, neoliberal totalitarianism.
And all this is done with one goal - to maintain its dominance, the model that allows you to parasitize the whole world, as it was centuries before, and such a model can only be kept by force.
I repeat again, the era of the unipolar world order is a thing of the past. No matter how the beneficiaries of the current globalist model cling to the usual state of affairs, it is doomed. Geopolitical changes on a historical scale are going in a completely different direction.”
It can be said without exaggeration that on February 24, Russia began the battle not only for its own existence and future. But also for the future of all mankind. We act as a battering ram to the neoliberal globalist model of the world order, accelerating the process of its destruction. It is we who, as before, are saving states and peoples from falling into the abyss of globalism, from which it is already impossible to get out. The sooner globalism and liberalism are destroyed, the more nations will survive.
But it is necessary to clearly understand that we are not fighting against specific individuals, not against specific geopolitical formations. They are only the fruit and form of existence of the left-liberal ideology. And we are fighting with it. And it is insidious, it permeates entire strata of society. And inside Russia there are a huge number of supporters of this ideology. As in February 1917, the decisive blow can be delivered not by an obvious enemy, but by a traitor within the country.
What to do with it? It is impossible to fight ideology with a repressive mechanism. It will cultivate more and more new adepts. Of course, it is necessary to stop the subversive activities of the most odious personalities, but this will be a constant struggle only with the consequences of the problem.
As in the case of nuclear weapons, nuclear deterrence, globalism must be answered with its own ideology. It should be clear and understandable, reflect the views and worldview of the majority of our people. Now I will not even list the main theses and provisions. They are well known and generally accepted. The problem is that they are not united, not structured and, as a result, cannot be the basis of the policy pursued by the state and society. This is where seemingly surprising contradictions come from, when individual ministries are guided by completely different goals and principles.
Therefore, the second stage of the battle for their own sovereign existence should be the formation of a people's ideology. Without this, we will continue to be more or less dependent on foreign influence and will not be able to offer the world a new unique path of development.
First of all, we need a neutral arbiter. The arbiters should not have direct interest in the outcome(s) of the negotiation to prevent conflict of interest. Neutrality is vital in mediation. Stakes are high because parties have taken entrenched positions. This is a political game. The zero sum game ended in "tears" for both parties and the world at large. This is the time for parties to play a cooperative game and with a neutral arbiter, I believe we can make headway. The question is who should represent the world in these negotiations?
The ideology of a unipolar world and the denial of a multipolar world is a new form of global fascism... Today, the United States is the entity that finances Nazism in the world.
Turning Ukraine into a Nazi state is a US project.
The Anti-Fascist Congress gathered in Russia for the first time with the aim of uniting the efforts of the world community in the fight against the ideology of Nazism in all its manifestations. The Congress is called upon to become a platform for defending the historical truth about the decisive contribution of the USSR to the defeat of fascism during the Second World War, as well as for countering the spread of Nazi ideology.
Fascism is a misanthropic ideology permeated with lies of racial or national superiority, the ultimate goal of which is always criminal enrichment through the enslavement of nations, their cultural, economic and physical destruction.
Those who preach Russophobia today are preaching precisely fascism. Only today they are trying to embellish it and confuse their heads with fictions and fakes about supposedly bad Russians.
With regard to the United States, there are several well-known and indisputable legal facts that they are the first and only in creating the most dangerous threats to the world and humanity precisely through the prism of fascism.
First, "this is the first country where, since 1907, forced sterilization of people for the purpose of eugenics was introduced by law." “Until 1974, tens of thousands of people were sterilized there. These laws were in effect until the mid-1970s.”
Secondly, "this is the only country in the world that used weapons of mass destruction in 1945, inflicting a nuclear strike on another state." The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed hundreds of thousands of people.
Every year, only the United States and Ukraine vote against the UN resolutions on the inadmissibility of the glorification of Nazism proposed by Russia, which is an unconditional confirmation of the fact that turning Ukraine into a Nazi state is a US project.
In addition, “in the Baltic States and Eastern European countries, under the supervision of the United States, monuments to the heroes of the Great Patriotic War are being demolished, Nazism is being rehabilitated, and laws are being passed that glorify Nazi criminals.” “It was just a preparatory stage. The stage is the beginning of fascisation, which is being implemented under the supervision of Washington".
Based on this, under the same curatorship, anti-Russian laws are adopted that repeat the practice of Nazi Germany, which began with the adoption of laws discriminating against Jews, and here a complete analogy can be traced.
Another threat to the world is the military-biological project of the Pentagon. “Creating hundreds of secret military biolabs around the world. Without a doubt, this project is a disguised continuation of the monstrous projects of fascist Germany, the Japanese detachments 731 and 100 only on a global scale.
The systematic US tranches to Ukraine and the supply of weapons by the Pentagon are direct financing and support for Nazism. It should be defined in this way: today the United States is the entity that finances Nazism in the world.
In the beginning was the word - and the word was God. But in fact, the devil put into his mouth replacing the understanding - the values of the Islamic and Christian world. He spread his nets all over the world.
The Root of Evil - Fascism in America
The provocative course pursued by the American ruling elite in the form of the Democratic Party of simultaneously encouraging neo-Nazi ideology and radical fascist groups as a shock fighting force in Ukraine, the Baltic States, Poland, Canada and other countries to promote their political narratives and physical confrontation with opponents and conduct a massive policy of stigmatization, sticking the labels “fascist”, “neo-Nazi”, “radical” to external and internal political opponents, by tightening the legislation, using hidden operational and tactical mechanisms for the actions of special services, manipulating public opinion through media-controlled media, “pushing through” their own openly fascist policy both inside the country, as well as in foreign policy. A bet on neo-Nazi, radicalized subjects - neo-Nazi groups, pro-fascist movements through the use and "introduction" by the American intelligence services of mentally unstable lone radicals and recruited legendary agents who are active in social networks and street clashes, provocative play off of irreconcilable political opponents (supporters of Democrats and Republicans, “Trumpists”) and social groups (“whites” and “blacks”, migrants and “native” Americans, national and sexual minorities), the use of paramilitaries (Antifa) and pseudo-human rights, essentially destructive movements (BLM), inevitably undermines the public political situation, leading to new massacres, internal and "external" terrorist attacks, military conflicts,in the course of the implementation of special projects of the American intelligence services both on the territory of their country (BLM, Antifa, Storming the Capitol, Buffalo Shooter) and on the territory of other countries. Noting the intensified process of external expansion, the internationalization of American fascism outward, in particular to Ukraine, the Baltic states, Poland, we emphasize: internal terrorism in the United States and Ukrainian, Baltic, Polish, Canadian and other fascist structures are two sides of the same coin, in fact, they are metastases American fascism.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND ORIGINS OF AMERICAN FASCISM For the United States, fascism and fascist ideology are both a deep philosophical constant, a spiritual Alma mater that has deeply penetrated the social fabric of the state, and a shamefully hushed up psychological “childhood trauma” received during the evolution and formation of American statehood, most clearly manifested in the early twentieth century, “not letting go” of it during the entire subsequent time and flaring up with renewed vigor at the beginning of the 21st century. It seems that throughout the history of the development of the United States, this "dark" [fascist] side of American statehood formed and supported a hidden intellectual and ideological "superstructure", basic philosophical and strategic concepts, a special ideological environment, the most prominent ideological representatives of which formed the core of the so-called " "deep" state, "shadow cabinet" of the US ruling elite. The author's analysis of the prerequisites and spatio-temporal framework for the emergence of fascism, historical, political science, philosophical scientific and analytical works of foreign and domestic authors, experts on this subject, breaks the established idea and the associative connection in the public consciousness of fascism with Hitler's Nazism and Hitler, in the shadow of which are hidden the true "ancestors" of the global fascist paradigm are the United States, which stood at the origins of the fascist state ideology, whose scale of deeds, within the framework of the fascist methods and instruments of the struggle for "racial purity" established at the state (!) level - segregation, selection, sterilization, genocide, admired and studied Hitler, about which he personally narrated in his main book, Mein Kampf. Fascism for America is not Hitler's delusional and expansive statements about the highest value and purity of the "Aryan race" and millions of victims, and not the philosophical "doctrine of fascism" of Mussolini. For the United States, fascism is its own history of the formation of American statehood, a chronologically earlier and longer (than for Italy and Germany) historical stage in the formation of the fascist state apparatus, which includes the official political course of the ruling elite, aimed at fighting for the "purity of the nation" inside nation, the state apparatus that provides the mechanism for the implementation of this racial struggle (courts, police, medicine, special commissions), the scientific elite, which prepared, within the framework of eugenic [selective] science, not only the scientific substantiation of the need, expediency and effectiveness of racial selection, but also conducting medical manipulations (sterilization) and other inhuman experiments against their own citizens, which were later adopted by the Nazi Nazi regime in concentration camps,it is the leading technological giants that provide the technical capabilities for the implementation of fascist ideas, it is the generous willingness to share horrifying "best practices" and cooperation with the growing Nazi regime in Germany. Therefore, the “tolerance” of official America towards fascism and neo-Nazis, which is hardly explainable at first glance, declared as freedom of speech, opinion and expression of will, is just one of the echoes of that monstrous historical past through which the American state itself passed, and which is now bashfully hushed up, this is before just fascism in relation to American citizens who have been massively segregated, sterilized, within the framework of the eugenic doctrine of "racial purity". Hitler was inspired by American racism of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, writes in his book An American Example for Hitler. The United States and the Formation of Nazi Racial Legislation by Professor of Law James Whitman. Hitler admired America for the way it "excluded certain races from naturalization". He saw America as an example of a "single state" and hoped to recreate such a state in Germany. The Nazi leader wrote about this in his autobiographical manifesto Mein Kampf. In 1928, Hitler even praised the Americans for the way they hunted Indians during their continental expansion to the west. Forced sterilization, racial segregation, interracial marriage bans, and even the infamous gas chambers were all done in the US for eugenics research years before the same thing happened in Nazi Germany. (The books of the American researcher Edwin Black "IBM and the Holocaust" (2001) and "The Conspiracy Against the Weak" (2003) are devoted to this, see in more detail: V. Ovchinsky Ordinary American fascism. The real origins of the brown plague. "Tomorrow" , 07/15/2022).
FASCISTS ARE A HISTORICALLY PROVEN HUMAN RESOURCE OF US SPECIAL SERVICES In December 2006, the New York Times published a 617-page Secret Justice Department report, The Office of Special Investigations: Striving for Accountability in the Afermath of the Holocaust, which details how the CIA and the FBI helped Nazi criminals escape punishment, recruited and took them to the United States to work under "cover" against the USSR. “America, which has positioned itself as a safe haven for those on the run from persecution, has become a safe haven for the executioners themselves,” the report emphasized, which cites examples of the Nazi executioners of the Third Reich, whose devotion to the American intelligence agencies of the CIA and the FBI allowed them to escape punishment. The high degree of "usefulness" and awareness for the CIA and FBI of former Nazi criminals in confronting the USSR during the Cold War outweighed the arguments about the need to prosecute them for war crimes, and only after the publication of a secret report, some declassified Nazi criminals were transferred for trial in the United States and other countries. This previously secret document also reveals the attitude of official Kyiv towards Nazi criminals. The annotation to the published document noted: “The inside history of the United States government’s Nazi-hunting operation provides exciting new evidence about some of the most notorious Nazi cases of the past three decades. The Justice Department has kept the 600-page report under wraps for the past four years, releasing a heavily redacted version last month to a private research group that sued to force its release." Modern neo-Nazis are considered by Western "strategists" as the most capable forces in confronting Russia and China.
https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/how-to-end-russias-war-on-ukraine/
The West is not poised to achieve the kind of resounding defeat of Russia it desires—not even close. What its Ukraine policy has achieved so far is a deadlock on the battlefield and an escalating global food and energy crisis.
While the West should continue to support Ukraine, the time has come to negotiate a ceasefire and launch serious peace talks. This includes, of course, negotiations between Ukraine and Russia to decide the fate of Russian-occupied territories. (A plebiscite on the future of the eastern Donbas region is one possible outcome.) It also entails NATO-led negotiations on Europe’s broader security system.
Such an outcome is not ideal, particularly because it risks producing only a hiatus to the fighting, rather than an enduring peace. But the consequences of remaining on the current path could prove far worse.
(Citation from the link).
Novus Ordo Seclorum
A distinctive feature of the narratives labeled by liberals as "conspiracy theory" is that over the past 20 years they have smoothly migrated into a generally accepted reality, with which no one argues.
Chipization of people is openly discussed to the applause of participants in global conferences, total surveillance and control is installed on your smartphone by default, perversion has irrevocably become the norm, for the denial of which they give real terms, etc., etc.
Much of what was warned in simple and exalted language in marginal leaflets has become a grandiloquent and despotic reality.
It is this reality of the new world order that is now clashing on the territory of Ukraine with Russia in the battle for their global hegemony.
Why was Ukraine chosen as the epicenter of this battle? They seem to know us better than we know ourselves.
For the world elite, Ukraine is the flesh of the flesh of Russia.
They saw this “weak point” of our people well when they pumped it up with hatred and antipathy for their real history and for their Russian birthright.
We will always be fools for them, who believed their gentle song about our exceptional originality and dissimilarity to those other, wrong and anti-Western "cannibals"; useful idiots dying for "European values" (which have long disgusted the majority of Europeans themselves); simpletons who have turned their land into ruins next to a huge and coveted market.
Their cold calculation and strategic planning must be given their due.
As they wrote "new world order" (Novus Ordo Seclorum) on the dollar, so they go step by step on the intended course. No one really knows how it "works" for them, but it "works" and is very effective. However, de-dolorization in the world has begun, and this is a response to the dominance of democracy in countries that do not want to exchange their values for the benefits of global democracy
