Generally, the new advanced technologies in any field are developed for the betterment of the society. Likewise, the investigative and diagnostic advanced technologies in medical science are also developed to improve the quality of investigative procedure so that appropriate treatment strategies could be planned. While strengthening the investigative technology, whether it gives any adverse effects at society level, if so at what point?
Dear @Ratan, this is a very interesting issue; Rapidly changing medical technology and availability of high technology diagnostic and therapeutic equipment together with changing practice pattern of doctors has revolutionized the way health care is being delivered today is disscussed in the following paper entitled: "The impact of medical technology on healthcare today by Tan and Ong". The full paper can be read at the page:
http://www.hkcem.com/html/publications/Journal/2002-4/231-236.pdf
Advnces in technology can be considerd as a good but many physician now a days solely depends on lab investigation, xrays, MRI rather than clinical examination.. So it increases medical cost..
Population aging is a powerful and transforming demographic force. We are only just beginning to comprehend its impacts at the national and global levels. As we prepare for a new demographic reality, we hope this report raises awareness not only about the critical link between global health and aging, but also about the importance of rigorous and coordinated research to close gaps in our knowledge and the need for action based on evidence-based policies. http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf
Any advancement in technology in general increases the burden because it is likely to increase the cost of its application. When this technology is applied indiscriminately it is likely to increase the burden on the national exchequer. What we are seeing these days is that there are some technologies that are being developed which help prolong the life without actually improving the quality of life. IMHO it is for the patient to decide when to use these advanced technologies whether they are simply improving the life span while decreasing the quality of life or improving the quality. If all patients are able to exercise such educated options, then it will not be a burden.
Dear @ Abedallah and Lala, thanks for interesting links...
Dear @ Dhara and Nageswara, I agree with you that application of advanced technology is always expensive...
Dear @Ratan, the research "Adding Value: The Economic and Societal Benefits of Medical Technology" gives the answers to your question! Social burden is increased, yes, because, as @Nageswara stated, not every patient can afford it
http://advamed.org/res.download/352
In the last 70 years or so, the longevity of life has exponentially increased, thanks to the developments in the medical science. Any research of this type is a must for sustainability, and we must provide for this social expenditure happily. Otherwise, society will stagnate. Especially, developing countries have to resolve these dilemmas--whether to focus on uplifting people out of more manifest problems or spending more on research so that it helps us remain a modern and progressive nation. These are always difficult decisions, and which way to go depends upon so many considerations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkSRLYSojo
Advanced technology in the form of "telemedicine" is increasing the social burden. The doctor-patient relationship has undergone a radical change. Formerly, the doctor could touch the patient, and for some unexplainable reason, touch had a curative effect. Now, when a doctor examines a patient with Skype, he can see and hear the patient, but cannot touch him. I cannot help but think that while minimizing physical distance, such treatment loses the possibility of manual healing.
Dear Nelson, Yes. Advanced technology in the form of "telemedicine" is increasing the social burden.
Dear @ Ahel, I agree with you that nobody is there to stop development of advanced technology which are helping in diagnosis.
On other hand, due to technology it is able save life of many critically ill, meanwhile leaving behind increasing no of disabilities for lifelong which ultimately become burden to society. Examples:
Dear @ Kamal, I agree with you and thanks for elaborating the practical issues on the topic...
Yes it does, but the long term benefits to society outweigh the short term social burden, especially in countries where there is free government healthcare system.
When there is a cure for aging (assuming there is a gene sequence for aging) it should be free! Although, I have a hunch, it will be very expensive and not available to all. The social burden will be who gets the cure and who does not.
Dear @ Issam & Rejinald, I agree with you that the it should be free or minimal cost and open for everyone...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Agriculture