Some journals have started to provide certificate of article published in their journal. Do you think do you need such a certificate after you publish your article?
Dear Dr. Hom Nath Chalise, Thank you very much for this interesting question:
Yes, I do accept publication certificate from Research Journal, actually, I do have one.
Yes, Publication is it self a certificate, but some predatory Journal are doing this activities. We authors who submit our valuable articles to such a journal for expecting certificate, shows where is our thinking.
The current currency is the published research article. However, adminitration of the university may accept/prefer alterative formats.
Dear Dr. Hom Nath Chalise, Thank you very much for this interesting question:
Yes, I do accept publication certificate from Research Journal, actually, I do have one.
Hi there, some journal offer certificate.. Some donot..
They r not necessarily required.. But there is no wrong in accepting a certificate also, if provided..
U r accepting it for ur published work..
No , why ??? Publication with our name is good enough , the DOI will show our association in the paper ...
For me , it is too much of paper in terms of certification :)
It doesn't matter , the publication is enough to act as a certificate.
Dear Scholar
Have a great day ! Thank you so much for your healthy discussions.
Dear Dr Hom
It makes no diffrences. But if the journal do sent certificate that would be nice and benefical
Regards
My suggestions: try to publish in a good impact journal, that will be best reward as well as certificate. Please do not go behind the rumor of certificate.
Publication certificate for what, additional paper that you need to store. May be time to some creative IT idea for this.
What is the benefit of the certificate, that once you publish in a magazine and accept your search and get the authenticity is in itself a testament to the strength of your search and the greatness of your achievement and your work
Really I don't need. If my article was published, then there is no need for a certificate. Even if you look from a utilitarian point of view, then anyone can read the article, who needs this certificate? And I will not send anybody, just put on the wall?
I am confident in the greatness of my research and achievement, so I do not need a certificate from a particular point or magazine, confidence and belief in personal abilities is the biggest certificate
بالطبع لا، يكفي نشر المقال، ومن ثم اثبات نشره من خلال تقديم مستلة منه أو تقديم نسخة عن العدد الذي نشر به المقال للجهة التي نود اتجاهها مسألة النشر، سواء تعلق الأمر بمناقشة أو ملف تأهيل أو أي ترقية علمية..
There is no need for such certificate. The publication alone is the greatest certificate that will be there forever.
Certificate for research publication is not important but letter of information is better. It is just to inform you that your paper has been published.
Certificate is not required. We only expect quality of the publication and that should be model/reference for scientific research for next generation.
Hi,
The certificate issue is interesting. It reminds me of a certificate for participating in a race of some sort. Probably a Marathon. Awarding certificate for publishing a scientific paper was probably designed to remind us that we are joining a race.
I have just got my first paper accepted to a reputed IEEE (say X for generality) conference. Now, one of the authors have registered for the conference as a student member of X. I have applied for student membership, but probably won't receive the member card before registration deadline. In that case, I have been informed that only the author attending the conference would be getting the certificate. So I have the following question:
1) Do I need the certificate to proof that I have this publication in future ? (My dept has procedure of submitting copies of all certificates that you earn during the semester, and my co-author would definitely be submitting his there.)
2) Is it worth to register without availing student discount so that I may get the certificate ?
For a paper to be published when forwarded for a scientific journal, they give an acceptance letter. Then, after publishing, the paper itself in the journal is an enough certificate for publishing.
According to TRI rules, if you have recommendations =200, your RI = 200*0.25= 50. Am I right ?
It would be nice to have one since you publish the article but even if not then ok. Optional is a good answer.
Of course, I certainly need such a certificate as it documents my scientific and academic efforts
To add more detail, it is rather a formality. When the paper is published let the others determine the scientific contribution. Someone will read it some time and benefit. that is always the best certificate.
a certificate after you publish your article
This is a new form of burocratic paper , so new administrative paper, but not a scientific advance
Best regard
When a journal accept an article to publish they provide a letter of acceptance. And again, when the article is published it is the biggest certificate of anyone contribution.
Dear It is nice but if not available the is seen in internet.
After a paper has been published, the title of the journal and the paper, authors' names and affiliations, volume, issue, and page numbers, are all that is required.
It sound nice, but not important as the title of the journal and the paper, authors' names and affiliations, volume, issue, and page numbers, are all that is required. Totally agree with Michael John McAleer
I believe article's DOI will make it easy for anyone to access the journal article. However, I understand that some institutions might find it easier to ask their faculty to provide a certificate, perhaps for AACSB accreditation record keeping or likewise. I agree with professor Michael John McAleer and those who do NOT find the extra bureaucracy necessary.
Published article itself is the certificate. I think no need of extra certificates.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publisher