These cells were isolated from lung cancer xenograph. I have been culturing them in DMEM/F12/B27/FGF for over a month now. They looked like fibroblasts to me but they are forming colonies.
I think it can be adenocarcinoma, which means epithelial origin. Clustering can mean the presence of "cancer stem cells", which self-renew and generate other cancer cell types, more differentiated. Try to stain for epithelial markers, such as E-cadherin and keratin.
The first reaction I thought these cells are endothelial but they can not grow in DMEM. It is possible that they are fibroblast as you mentioned but have sorry to say (Andrey) that they don't look as epithelial cells for me. The easiest way is to run IHC against different receptors such EGFR or FGFR or even VEGFR (in case these cells are modified endothelial cells).
if I have well-understood the experiment, this cells are coming from tumour tissue of a mouse xenograft model. Therefore, I assume you injected human cells in a mouse. Was this the procedure used ? Did you inject a cell line or a patient-derived culture?
If this is the case, you run a qPCR on you cells for human actin and mouse actin, you should see signal only (or predominantly) from human PCR. You didn't inject fibroblasts or endothelial cells, therefore they should be positive only to mouse actin. In theory this is applicable to any specific qPCR for mouse or human genes.
If your PCR is positive for human, this will tell you that you have a quite well-enriched population of cancer cells. Then, I agree with with Fuad and Andrey, you should further prove it by epithelial markers staining (keratins).
Unfortunately we are still using 50 yo technology to diagnose the origin, in 2015, of hyperactive cell lines. That's what we get for letting are most creative scientist get away and build rockets and assorted modern technology in other fields.