Could anyone suggest techniques for testing the following 2 Hallmarks of Cancer: 1. Resisting Cell Death & 2. Activating Invasion and metastasis? Any literature on this would be appreciated as well. Thanks
For you question 2, you may use in vitro invasion and wound healing assays, pls refer to our recent publication: Anti-angiogenic pathway associations of the 3p21.3 mapped BLU gene....
For you question 2, you may use in vitro invasion and wound healing assays, pls refer to our recent publication: Anti-angiogenic pathway associations of the 3p21.3 mapped BLU gene....
for anti-apoptosis, you can also investigate caspase 3/7 activity by using commercial kit from Millipore.. FACS or reading absorption. depend on your perference..
This somewhat depends on your sample/material. What do you plan on testing? My guess would be tumor cell lines in cell culture? If you let me know I'll be glad to give my 2 cents on which assays to use.
For resistance, we would normally do a basic proliferation assay (MTT or MTS), with and without a drug treatment. You can also use more molecular techniques (such as PARP cleavage) if you know the drug should cause apoptosis.
As for Q2......
There is a really nice cell motility kit you can get from Thermo Scientific, (#K0800011). Nice pictures, you can do it in a 96 well plate, and much better than the traditional scratch assay systems. See the following publication (Figure 1) ....(attached)
Éamon is absolutely right. Typically you would measure first basic proliferation using an "easy" assay such as MTT or WST-1 (or measure cell death, e.g. using crystal violet).
If you see effects, you will likely want to go more into detail to pinpoint which mechanism is causing cell death. Here the first step is usually the discrimination between apoptosis and necrosis. Apoptosis is most commonly detected with either Annexin-V (binds to Phosphatidylserin, which is transported to outer membrane during apoptosis) or by detection of the caspase cascade, in which PARP is cleaved by caspases. Necrosis can be tested by nucleic acid probes, which are impermeant to live or apoptotic cells, but stain necrotic cells (such as propidium iodide or EthD-III).
I have to pass on quesiton 2, but I think Éamon is leading you onto the right track there as well :-)
Sorry for my late response but I entered the RG community only two months ago ... and I red so many interesting questions!
I think that unfortunately "THE" hallmark of cancer is it resistance to current treatments. And unfortunately once again, this resistance relates in fact to "multi resistances", and I am not at all speaking here about the so well known "mutldrug resistance phenotype" (MDR), which unfortunately (once again ....) did not contribute any successfull "clinical" compounds while thousands or articles published...
Five attached articles detail important aspects of cancer "resistance" and the remaining five articles to innovative models.
I actually think that we cannot more pretend studying "cancer hallmarks" while using a colorimetric assay (such as the MTT one) running on some "poor isolated" cancer cells that are prisonneers (for some of them sinces decades !!!!! as established cell lines) in plastic flasks ...
Studying the "cancer hallmarks" by this approach would represent ths same strategy for someone going to catch a big fish in a supermarket (a little bit easy to perform than fishing the same fish in the middle of nowhere in an ocean ...).