Most (not to say all) of the researchers have used arguments of brain structure, language area in the brain, dominant hemisphere in the brain, etc, etc.

Mine is very simple:

Men in Pre-History did not know anything about physiology, medicine, organs, surgery, etc. but men survived hunting and fighting.

You know why?

They realized that injuries in the left side of the chest were mostly mortal.

NOW we know there is a heart that is mortally damaged when it is injured. Pre-Historic men did not know.

What they did?

They started using the LEFT HAND to hold shields of wood, later metal and that way they realized they started surviving hunting and fighting in a safer way

.

Conclusion:

Generations after Generations starting using more and more the right hand and it became predominant in evolution, meanwhile, WE (I am) left-handed people became less and less predominant.

Do you consider this argument logical?

More Fermin De La Fuente Calvo's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions