- In recent years, a number of score types have been developed in relation to activities and achievements in academic life. Nowadays evaluations are made according to those ratings. RG also has many scoring rates such as RG Skore, h-index, Total Research Interest, Citations, Recommendations, Publication Recommendations, Reads, Full Text Reads,…… Which of these scores is the best reflector of academic activities and academic success?
There are too many types of scores, and I don't know exactly what these scores are based on. I think the main thing that shows academic success is the citations to publications. The more citation is, the more success you have.
I don't know which Researchgate scores are more important in evaluating academic activities. In my opinion, if there was a score that could measure the reliability of the studies, it would definitely be the best score.
Dear Yunus Emre Sarı and Elif Fatma Özkan Pehlivanoğlu, thanks for your replies.
I don't know which Researchgate scores are more important in evaluating academic activities. The high number of readings of my articles makes me happy.But, of course, the main determinants are citations.
iDearb am new at RG but seems to me H index and citations would be more important but RG scoring is also a promotion, i like it.
Formula is hidden- there are members having no research but very high score On other hand few having 3-4 thousand abswers have very high score- i have seen some members with high citation n H factor even then score is arround 25-30. I think the formula or criteria must be clwar which will add a lot to reputation of RG
Dear Syed Amir Gilani, I would like to thank you for your sincere answer and suggestion.
Dear Emre Pakdemirli, I would like to thank you for your sincere reply.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Citations