RG is a very successful social networking site for scientists and researchers to share their papers, to ask or to answer the questions and to find collaborators, etc..
RG is a network which lets us connect with more than 15 million researchers and access more than 130 million publications.
Could you share your suggestions for the development of that social network used widely?
I am thinking of updating scientific, efficient and e-learning
We need to come up with some more effective structuring by areas of interest.
Dear Mauro Luisetto, د. علي عبود مالك, Anastas Ivanov Ivanov, Luaay Abdulwahid Shihab and Vadim S. Gorshkov thanks for your answers and valuable opinions.
Groups can be formed in the structure of the RG according to their field of study. Newly developed works according to the field of interest can be viewed on the homepage. For those who have limited time, it can take time to decompose the work.
Dear Elif Fatma Özkan Pehlivanoğlu, thanks for your recommendation for making RG able to used more active and effective.
Unfortunately, many non-academic questions fill this page, which should be more academic, and this should be avoided. It can also be more useful for users if RG founders or managers create an editorial team, edit each month's most popular publications, and present us with a system like UpToDate.
Dear Yunus Emre Sarı, thanks for your proposal. A nice suggestion, hopefully there is a solution for this issue.
I have seen a few cases where one's publication is being enlisted under the publication lists of other persons. RG can look into the issue.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Papers