I had applied to RG to be released from the score madness and to close my score account. But they refused. They're using a better method now: If you ask a lot of questions and answer a lot with the aim of getting as many points as possible, you will get less points - and much less. This is also a good method.
I had applied to RG to be released from the score madness and to close my score account. But they refused. They're using a better method now: If you ask a lot of questions and answer a lot with the aim of getting as many points as possible, you will get less points - and much less. This is also a good method.
Private correspondence is possible still, that's okay, but to be requested from the system to "share" questions like "How was your weekend?" or "Which color do you prefer?" is humilating. Hundreds discussed such questions but htis has nothing to do with scietific research and its problems.
RG score if it is to be changed for its best; then , it should compare with the criteria set for rewarding score to the contribution made by the researchers. When making ranking of University in India for Agricultural Universities ,one criteria is number of citations of papers of a researcher of the University given by 'Scopus'. In such way, if the RG score is made to be considered and make a reliable and worthy criterion in giving ranking of the University as I have cited above; more researchers will join this group, and other can get benefits from the shared research works. Just an opinion.