Curiosity & wonder along with good good grasp of background knowledge, passion for research and hard work .
“Wonder, connected with a principle of rational curiosity, is the source of all knowledge and discovery, and it is a principle even of piety; but wonder which ends in wonder, and is satisfied with wonder, is the quality of an idiot.”
Little is known about how to generate plausible new scientific ideas. So it is noteworthy that 12 years of self-experimentation led to the discovery of several surprising cause-effect relationships and suggested a new theory of weight control, an unusually high rate
Curiosity & wonder along with good good grasp of background knowledge, passion for research and hard work .
“Wonder, connected with a principle of rational curiosity, is the source of all knowledge and discovery, and it is a principle even of piety; but wonder which ends in wonder, and is satisfied with wonder, is the quality of an idiot.”
Yes, necessity, curiosity, but above all our capacity of concentration and intelligent analysis are the main ingredients, that build our will to advance.
Distress and lack of confidence are the worst enemies of scientific research...
I'd heard - some time ago in some "training" at work (an outside lecture which was actually quite good), I think - that most progress in a field comes from people with expertise outside of that field. Paradigms are good for keeping our thoughts and actions organized, but new thinking comes from "outside of the box." However, I think most of this builds on the established. An entirely new direction would be, I think, and I think should be, rare. - "All progress is change, but not all change is progress."
Rejection, modeling / experimentation and observation. All Sciences are based on observations. We are forced to advance by questioning and rejecting.
The introduction of mathematics revealed a new tool in scientific advancement. I recall the ancient philosophical concept introduced by Pythagoras and Plato, the Music of the Spheres that describes and relates to the movements of celestial bodies as a form of a music. “Pythagoras first identified that the pitch of a musical note is in proportion to the length of the string that produces it, and that intervals between harmonious sound frequencies form simple numerical ratios”.
The Music of the Spheres incorporates the principle that mathematical relationships express qualities or "tones" of energy which manifest in numbers, visual angles, shapes and sounds – all connected within a pattern of proportion.
The existence of “physical bodies / nuclear bodies” both at the microcosm and macrocosm reinstitute the principle that mathematical relationships which manifest by shapes and numbers – all connected by a pattern of proportion – could in effect be at the origin of new observations in biomedical research.
Diagnosis involved discovering the source of the disturbance of equilibrium, and treatment involved a procedure that would restore equilibrium. This Pythagorean view of health as a balance could be crucial in positioning “physical/nuclear bodies” in the center of cell functioning.
Research ideas and research problems originate from many sources. We discuss four of these sources in the text: everyday life, practical issues, past research, and theory. Regardless of the source of your idea, a key point is that you must develop a questioning and inquisitive approach to life when you are trying to come up with research ideas.
• Everyday life is one common source of research ideas. Based on a questioning and inquisitive approach, you can draw from your experiences and come up with many research topics. For example, think about what educational techniques or practices you believe work well, or do not work well. Would you be interested in doing a research study on one or more of those techniques or practices?
• Practical issues can be a source of research ideas. What are some current problems facing education (e.g., facing administrators, teachers, students, parents). What research topics do you think can address some of these current problems?
• Past research can be an excellent source of research ideas. Past research is probably the most important source of research ideas. That’s because a great deal of educational research has already been conducted on a multitude of topics, and, importantly, research usually generates more questions than it answers. This is also the best way to come up with a specific idea that will fit into and extend the research literature. For students planning on writing a thesis or dissertation, the use of past research is extremely helpful, and remember to not just look at the variables and the results, but also carefully examine how they conducted the study.
The production of ideas is just as definite a process as the production of Fords- James Webb Young
it actually requires the hardest kind of intellectual work to follow, so that not all who accept it use it
The two general principles of ideas:
James describes two principles of the production of ideas, which I really like:
1. an idea is nothing more or less than a new combination of old elements
2. the capacity to bring old elements into new combinations depends largely on the ability to see relationships
Criticize your ideas—don’t accept them immediately
Do not make the mistake of holding your idea close to your chest at this stage. Submit it to the criticism of the judicious.
Set aside time
John says your thoughts need time to settle down before your creativity will feel safe enough to emerge and get to work. Setting aside time to think regularly can be a good way to train your mind to relax, eventually making this set time a safe haven for your tortoise mind to start putting together connections that could turn into ideas.
Find a creative space
Setting aside time regularly sends a signal to your brain that it’s safe to work on creative ideas. Finding a particular space to be creative in can help, too.
This is a most welcome and interesting question...me too, I tend to believe that our past research is the source of new idea and new topics...it may be a paeadox, but the more experienced a researcher is, the more questions, ideas and research problems she finds...well, this may be true only for the fundamental research that we practice.
And I think that scientific research is indeed like a passing through multiple gates that may be unlocked only with observations, knowledge, learning by doing, new ideas, methods, new concepts, ultimately new outcomes.
I agree with the very interesting views of the colleagues.
I consider that the human brain which is dominated by the thirst to go further is an important source of new ideas in scientific research, as pointed out by Dr. Egorov and Dr. Seraji.
As described in the link below, the final push to scientific breakthroughs are often provided by serendipity (fortunate happenstance). So, one of the important things for getting a new idea in research is to acquire the ability not to miss serendipity.
When I hear this phrase as the world becoming a global village, I Don't feel good. As this terminology is used by "Haves" for "Haves-Not", i.e., when North talking to South. , this type of literature is used.
Many a times our mundane life will stand as new sources of new ideas. Some unforeseen problems that would arise will also give a clue as to how to solve them.
Need is mother of every invention and needs keep changing with time and circumstances. Say for example the increasing population needs increased food production and this demanded development of techniques of increasing food production. Increased need of energy required new ideas for finding new sources of energy. Increased pollution level due to conventional sources of energy also added need of new ideas of developing sources of pollution free energy. Urge of breaking records also demands new ideas. Say for example to break record of reaching highest height in space by a balloon, reaching lowest depth in a sea, reaching shortest travel time for travelling by train, or plane, etc. need newer ideas. Newer ideas are always needed to solve widely different problems, if conventional ideas are not solving problems.
New ideas cannot be "ordered" or even achieved by pressure, they can develop i an environment of free spirit / free thinking (which creates creativity)
What is the source of new ideas in scientific research?
Hope this question allows us to think aloud to stretch scientific research to cover some unorthodox domains as stated in scripture like walking on water, can sun stand still for a day, religious healing, physical resurrection from death etc. If we can provide empirical research evidence will be good contribution to knowledge. If we can't is still fine as Edison had shared "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work". Hope we can fuel these scientific research with passion & perseverance.
Q: “What is the source of new ideas in scientific research?”
A: Healthy and creative minds?
See the link: “Building scientific capacity in developing countries” by Eva Harris
(2004): The Summary:
“Simply transferring knowledge and instrumentation is not enough to help developing countries build their own research base. Such efforts must be tied to national and local needs to create trust and services for society in the long term.”
Curiosity, consciousness and application of wisdom give birth to the new ideas. Ideas are better solutions which needs curiosity followed by consciousness. Wisdom encourage our talents to apply previous knowledge, experience and experimentation to get a new solution.
This may draw some laughter, but I think one source of new ideas is how grad students try to impress their professors with innovative and creative thoughts. From my observation, many professors/researchers got some impressive ideas from their students.
Conception of a new idea often occurs in an intuitive flash of insight, in which the more or less complete idea is revealed. Equations and logical analysis come later. Someone who is reading scholarly publications in a library sees the final result in a format that is quite different from its initial conception. The fact that the public presentation is different from the way the idea initially occurred can lead to misunderstandings about how science is actually accomplished.
One of the principal ways to be creative is to look for alternative ways to view a phenomena or for alternative ways to ask a question. It is easy to ask questions that are trivial to solve. It is easy to ask questions that require extraordinary effort (e.g., 50 man-years of effort and millions of dollars in expenses) to solve. It is surprisingly difficult to find questions that lie in between these two extremes, and also have a result that is worth knowing.
One often-cited example of creativity is George de Mestral's observation of how cockleburs attach to clothing, which led him to invent the hook-and-loop fastener known as Velcro®. He transformed a common nuisance to a useful product. When one looks backward in time to analyze how a creative act was made, one often finds that creators made a novel interpretation of a well-known fact or occurrence. Often the interpretation converted a disadvantage into an advantage.
Another commonly cited example of creativity is Art Fry's development of Post-It® removable notes at 3M Corporation in 1974. Dr. Spencer Silver, another 3M scientist, had developed a polymer adhesive that formed microscopic spheres instead of a uniform coating, and thus was a poor adhesive that took years to set. Fry wanted a better bookmark for his church hymnal, so he used Silver's adhesive.
Most of the knowledge and much of the genius of the research worker lie behind his selection of what is worth observing. It is a crucial choice, often determining the success or failure of months of work, often differentiating the brilliant discoverer from an otherwise admirable but entirely unproductive plodder.
In my opinion everything can be the source for new ideas – walking in nature, reading articles and books, discussions with colleagues, questions of our students… The most important is to have “eyes” for new ideas, to “feel” them, to recognize them. To find a new idea we should have enough knowledge and imagination. New ideas are like seeds. They need adequate soil. That is why It is important our brain and our mind to be prepared for them.
Scientific research in our present century has made remarkable & enviable progress in the scientific & technological development where their zenith has enter in to planetary touch it is very likely that scientific research certainly make a progress in our present time.
In the line with the present range of the scientific including electronic media development .It is not necessary that consideration of population of different level of economic conditions, scientific research now should also concentration on such product where due to the economic condition they may not have to go for certain product of necessary range they may convenient come out with the research where such people can afford the similar range of product at their pocket prices.
I agree with Behrouz Ahmadi-Nedushan that conception of a new idea in an intuitive flash of insight on a project we are working on , the so called 'eureka ' moment . It can occur at any time & disappear very soon . It is preferable to keep a paper & pen to immediately note it down immediately before it disappears . It is always preferable to avoid multi tasking in a job to avoid diversions in thinking . The complex way our brain functions , is difficult to analyze at the present moment .
It is observed that several scientists with great depth of knowledge and with all seriousness work hard all their life but ultimately produce nothing of fundamental importance - while in contrast, certain carefree scientists with certain penetrating attitude of mind discover something of fundamental importance in whatever subject they undertake. So it is not just a new idea but the strength of a new Idea generated within known by sheer perseverance which matters!