The best advice I have for managers - or management students - who wish to inform their own practice with research is to 'trust but verify' their sources. In other words, if they are seeking to use information from a particular article, they should make sure that information has been empirically replicated by the authors, or elsewhere.
If they fail to find replication evidence, which is likely, all is not lost. In that case, they should ask themselves the following questions: "On the face of it, does the information presented in this article make sense?"; "Do the authors present their data clearly?"; and "Are the scales and survey instruments used valid and reliable?"
What advice would you give? Seeking answers from profs in any field. All answers welcomed!
Find more here in my blog: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/foxes-henhouses-golden-eggs-why-science-matters-studies-jeff-mcnally/
It leads to loss of resources and will collapse the whole economy , we must rise the sense of ethics and values also researcher must be joined to research ethics work shop after they finishing their proposal.
This is a political problem and marketing problem with both ethical and financial implications. Yet it is part of the decision making process that must be accepted and managed. The way the question is worded implies a moral or ethical conflict -- "dishonest" implies fraud and an attempt to use "fake" or incomplete data purposely to achieve the researcher's goal, not the client's. But the client too may decide to accept only answers that fit her/his preconceived or bias answer to the question.
The best way to deal with the problem is open discussion of the problem, with a focus on the causes and effects of the problem on operations. This implies using all the perspectives available to define the causes and their effects and weighing them against a desired institutional goal that solves the problem (has a real impact or effect on the problem). Then define the outcomes one expects and monitor and evaluate the results.
The political aspect is the relative power of the actors in the decision making situation to influence the decision. The financial aspect is the ROI that accrues to the organization that invested in the research.
Dishonesty in any spare of life is counted as bad thing. Teachers are considered as examples for students to lead their life in a better way. Students sometime follow their teachers blindly that’s why academic dishonesty may create a lot of problems socially. Academic Dishonesty comprises of any conscious/unconscious venture to distort,.......https://researchpedia.info/what-is-academic-dishonesty/
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Disease
- Infectious Diseases
- Immunization
- Vaccination
- Vaccines