Science is a study of systematically arranged facts that can be logically interpreted by natural, social and methodological sciences ... While engineering is a branch of science that deals with discipline to gain and use scientific, mathematical, economic, and practical knowledge to design and produce machines and devices....
Engineering is a part lesson of science & we are aware that students who are appearing for the engineering course they have to study their schooling as a science as main subject . With this science is very vast area creating the knowledge & research environment for the nature ,Earthly products metal , our planetary areas for which the movement of the space & also with the earthly environment whereby Science can totally make the universal with their scientific & research group for their creative invention make the humanity to offer their life in a comfortable & convenient manner .
There are as many engineers involved in research and development as there are scientists involved in application and optimization. In my opinion the main difference is the old Artistic/cerebral dichotomy. Scientists usually go for more philosophical subjects. Whereas Engineers usually go for more mathematical subjects.
Universities use these names for their departments or schools. The theoretical examination of problems is science (mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.,) and the applied science is engineering. However, scientists may act as engineers and engineers may be excellent scientists. In the rank of a doctorate there is no differentiation. You have to do everything.
Science is the mother for all applications in all engineering majors.
All engineer disciplines can be considered as applied sciences. A pure science includes more theoretical topics than applications. On the other hand, engineers use the tools of science to apply their projects in real life.
Science and engineering is a typical harmony and integration toward a better life.
Engineering science is the intersection of engineering (profession/practice) and science (research method/theory); exponential manufacturing and meta-technology are parts of this emerging engineering science, i.e. the technical fusion of science and practice.
Science in general refers to a branch of knowledge "dealing with a body of facts or truths gained through observation and experimentation." Engineering is the action, work, or profession of an engineer or the process of application of science (or art) in a specific area (e.g. in the construction of engines, bridges, buildings, mines, ships, and chemical plants.
The difference between science and engineering ... Science is the study of the natural world as it is; geometry creates tools, and new processes are based on scientific knowledge
An engineer is more on the physical aspect of matter (or materials) while a scientist is more on the functionality & "concepts" related to the matter (or material). However, both works on same scientific concepts of matter or material in the field of Science and Technology.
Science studies the "laws of nature" that is how it is made the universe and how the universe works (nature). What it is the universe? I do not know. But by universe, commonly, we mean: everything that is in the middle between a "quark" and a set of galaxies; that is, everything that is between the infinitely small and the infinitely large; including psychology, literature, poetry, etc., and everything that exists. Engineering uses "the laws of nature" for the benefit of man and the environment in which he lives (sensu lato). The boundary between researcher (scientist) and engineer is very fleeting. Often the researcher works as an engineer and the engineer works as a researcher.
While there are some intersections between engineering and science, engineering is not applied science (this has been covered in the philosophy of technology for the past 30 years or so).
Some of the differences and relations between the two are:
1) The scientist discovers while the engineer designs new artifacts and processes
2) The scientist tries to discover the underlying principles of nature. the engineer in turn might use these principles but it is not necessary for him to do so (some designs are even trial and error).
3) The engineers work can be to implement the design (but is not required to). Implementation can be delegated and the actual acquisition of the product by the client is the role of the entrepreneur(though an engineer can be one)
4) Science depends on engineering to develop the technology for science(though some physicists and chemist carry this work they are doing engineering at this point not science).
The question of whether technology (a thing that engineers do) can be traced to the history of science when at the more or less middle of the 20th century technology began to blur with science (see [1]). One f the main supporters for this thesis was Bunge[2]. If you want to see the response against technology and engineering as applied science see [3] and [4] respectively. In those last two references they cover some of the points I expressed in my last post.
[1]McClellan III, J. E., & Dorn, H. (2015). Science and technology in world history: an introduction. JHU Press.
[2] Bunge, M. (1979). Philosophical inputs and outputs of technology. The history and philosophy of technology, 262-281.
[3] Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it (Vol. 141). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[4] Laudan,]L.(2013 ). The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific change Relevant? Sociology of the Sciences - Monographs. Springer Netherlands, .
I am a researcher, my son is an engineer. once we were talking on this topic and his summary was: Mum, we are to solve the problems NOT for making the problems :)