Can anyone contribute some more evidence to my above question? Please see a comment which I wrote to an article by Massi et al:
Comment to
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222824307_Toward_Amorphous_Conductors_Enhanced_Conductivity_of_Doped_Polyaniline_via_Interchain_Crosslinking_Promoted_by_Acid-Functionalized_Aluminum_Quinolines
My comment refers to several aspects of this publication:
1) In reference [8], we did not comment on crystallinity, we did not imply that crystallinity is necessary for high conductivity, neither did we talk about „interchain hopping“ - in contrast: what we had shown in this publication
(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13279646_Fully_protonated_polyaniline_Hopping_transport_on_a_mesoscopic_scale?_sg=w92biEydVcDTcaT0lCQgiAZU5Qrj5ORqApAP-XOPyNaiSsgYiJcpe9f1ysg5a8jjVjAaIx4-JihomI4XWhSwJRmwgPE5pkXPcS--hawS._Ycu92KYFQmjuiLpuYwl5iteBT9kvDtEsuzFUqllK9n6qWiMqM34IZ4E6I9Arynky8guVPKFnrgDuaKOZC50qg) is that PAni – consisting of 10 nm size small globular primary particles – has two electron transport mechanisms, one being metallic (inside an about 8 nm small core), the other being hopping on the mesoscopic scale (as the title of our publication already suggests). We did NOT talk about „intrachain hopping“.
This makes PAni similar to other (conventional) nanometals like 10 to 100 nm small Fe, Cu or In particles which had previously been studied and discovered by the Nimtz group.
2) The relationship between structure and conductivity in PAni was finally described by me in
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49593603_New_Insight_into_Organic_Metal_Polyaniline_Morphology_and_Structure?_sg=w92biEydVcDTcaT0lCQgiAZU5Qrj5ORqApAP-XOPyNaiSsgYiJcpe9f1ysg5a8jjVjAaIx4-JihomI4XWhSwJRmwgPE5pkXPcS—hawS._Ycu92KYFQmjuiLpuYwl5iteBT9kvDtEsuzFUqllK9n6qWiMqM34IZ4E6I9Arynky8guVPKFnrgDuaKOZC50qg.
According to these findings, PAni chains are short and helical. The better the short helices are arranged between each other (and form effectively longer helices), the higher the conductivity.
3) The conductivity values reported by Massi et al. are not at all high. We have reported maximum macroscopic values in the range of 500 to 1000 S/cm, and have found intrinsic conductivity values (inside the primary particles) of up to 65,000 S/cm, see
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222425555_EPR_study_of_polyaniline_highly_doped_by_p-toluenesulfonic_acid?_sg=w92biEydVcDTcaT0lCQgiAZU5Qrj5ORqApAP-XOPyNaiSsgYiJcpe9f1ysg5a8jjVjAaIx4-JihomI4XWhSwJRmwgPE5pkXPcS--hawS._Ycu92KYFQmjuiLpuYwl5iteBT9kvDtEsuzFUqllK9n6qWiMqM34IZ4E6I9Arynky8guVPKFnrgDuaKOZC50qg
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236865616_Multifrequency_EPR_study_of_metal-like_domains_in_polyaniline?_sg=w92biEydVcDTcaT0lCQgiAZU5Qrj5ORqApAP-XOPyNaiSsgYiJcpe9f1ysg5a8jjVjAaIx4-JihomI4XWhSwJRmwgPE5pkXPcS--hawS._Ycu92KYFQmjuiLpuYwl5iteBT9kvDtEsuzFUqllK9n6qWiMqM34IZ4E6I9Arynky8guVPKFnrgDuaKOZC50qg
4) Again, I need to stress the fact that PAni is NOT soluble, also not in DMF. What the authors have seen are finde colloidal dispersions, as described in many publications by me, and reviewed here in
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253651172_Conductive_Polymers_as_Organic_Nanometals?ev=prf_ov_fet_res&_iepl%5BviewId%5D=Q1zdupzTvVDL4amwL4k1ftgzl86ebFKnGHAb&_iepl%5Bcontexts%5D%5B0%5D=prfhpi&_iepl%5Bdata%5D%5BstandardItemCount%5D=5&_iepl%5Bdata%5D%5BuserSelectedItemCount%5D=5&_iepl%5Bdata%5D%5BtopHighlightCount%5D=2&_iepl%5Bdata%5D%5BtopHighlightIndex%5D=1&_iepl%5Bdata%5D%5BfeaturedItem1of2%5D=1&_iepl%5BtargetEntityId%5D=PB%3A253651172&_iepl%5BinteractionType%5D=publicationTitle