Can we establish a new concept for man that takes into account the ideas of moral morality and also does not sacrifice the religious constants that have the credit to bear the burdens of man and humanity through ancient history?
This is a very complex question- and I wont hope to address it too far, except to offer one statement about 'resolving the science/religion conflict': The Catholic church made a decision and announced in the late 1960's that the Genesis story referred to the Creation of the Soul, and that Darwinian Evolution could still be an acceptable belief for good, practicing Catholics, because it was about the evolution of the Body, not the Soul. In other words, Faith/Religion is about the Non-Material/Spirituality, and Science is and can only be, about the Material/Concrete-Physicality. I hope this shines a little light. Thanks.
In order to establish a new concept while retaining religious constants it must be necessary to establish what these constants are given that both in ancient times as now religion comes in diverse forms, and that is assuming that it is even desirable to incorporate ancient ideas into modern definitions.
Adam and the beginning of the emergence of human speech
Words can not be called human words unless they are cut into distinct passages of sound that one makes consciously.
When humans became physiologically ready for the "humanization" of the soul, by erecting it on its feet and freeing the hands, and with an audio device capable of producing different tones. He said: "When your Lord said to the angels, I will create a caliph in the land, who said: 'I will make those who spoil it and shed blood, and we will praise you and sanctify you.' He said: I know what you do not know. (The cow 30).
Note in this verse saying: (I do). And the use of the name of the actor in saying: (I make) in it an indication of the continuation of the process as saying: (I am a human creator of clay) (p. 71) In the different stages of creation used (I am a creator) when he said: (I am doing) to denote the existence of human beings that have been settled and became ready to change in the process to become the successor of God in the earth, if not a successor, but it exists materially.
So the angels asked him: (I make it corrupt and shed blood) To compare this saying with the saying: (I created a human from clay) when he said: (Creator of human). He did not mention the angels' protest because he was not yet dead, and man was not in his ready form for the breath of the soul, so I follow her by saying: "If it is settled and I have blown it out of my soul, then prostrate it to him prostrating" (p. 72). However, the angels did not say: (I make it corrupt and shed blood). But when he said: (I make the earth a successor) came the protest, and the protest according to information Watch, which is when he said: (I make the earth a successor) were still human beings in the animal kingdom before the humanization, but it is based on the legs and has an audio device capable of The different toning was the behavior of cattle, which eat meat (and shed blood) to indicate the unconscious subversion in the forest as some species of monkeys do from cutting tree branches, and here we must not understand (spoiled it) as an immoral behavior any violation of the instructions of God Almighty It is called a corrupt market.
When food becomes inedible, we say: Food is spoiled and we do not say the food is rancid. Corruption is subversion as the Almighty says: (but the reward of those who fight God and His Messenger and seek in the land corruption ..) (Table 33). Here, they seek to destroy the trees, destroy roads and bridges, and demolish houses and structures.
(Al-Baqarah 60) (Hood 85) (Poets 183), and he said: "Do not corrupt the earth after it has been repaired"
And here we note the error in saying that {spoil and shed blood} means that there were rational creatures before Adam spoiled and shed blood and destroyed by God Almighty, or taught the angels that this creature will be corrupted in the ground and bloodshed, where the Koran looked, and it is true that the angels said what Indeed, when he said: (I make the earth a successor). Hence, we have to reconsider the saying that God created Adam and put him in Paradise and then created Eve and then expelled from Paradise and they and the devil and descended to the earth, for the following reasons:
The description of Paradise described to Adam is not like the description of the paradise of the pious, since the verses contained in the wise download around the clock and pictures and the other day show that heaven and hell have not yet been revealed but will be based on the ruins of this universe with new physical laws, . How can lure a man does not know anything and that does not exist? Adam was seduced by saying: "Shall I teach you the mole tree, and a king shall not wear it" (Taha 120). And saying: (What Nhakkma Rabkma about this tree only to be kings or be of the immortals} (customs 20).
If Adam did not know death and that things were worn out, then he would not be tempted to say so. This verse also notes that survival instinct is the strongest instinct of all creatures. Then comes the instinct of ownership and the survival of property by saying: (And the king does not wear). And this instinct moved from the Kingdom of the beast to humanity, that is, these instincts entered the human consciousness, and here appeared the concept of Satan as an enemy of man (Satan was a clear enemy of man) and animals are not devils or whispers, and added to these instincts desires, where desires are purely human concept Knowledge floor.
Then the description of the Paradise of Adam is very far from the description of the Paradise of the immortal in saying: (If you do not hunger and do not know) (Taha 118), {and you do not thirst in it and sacrifice) (Taha 119).
Here we note that it describes a paradise earth like a forest where the fruits are so natural that eating without it works. And "naked" here from the open, ie, out of the forest to the desert as saying: {Vnbtnh the desert is a small) (Safat 145) If he went out to the open it needs to work phenomenon to earn a living, so he said: (do not leave you out of Paradise Vtzqi) (Taha 117) .
And there is also in the forests where man lived water (not thirsty), and also the shadow (not sacrificed) where "sacrificed" came from the act of "sacrificed" in the Arabic tongue is a true origin indicates the emergence of the thing is said sacrificed man sacrifices, if exposed to the sun , And it is said that Zaid is the most prominent of the sun, and it is called the sacrifice because it is slaughtered at sunrise, and the suburb of each country is its prominent area.
Cite
Michele Shields
UCSF University of California, San Francisco
Man is an exclusive term. You would do better to use human, as a term,
Cite
1 Recommendation
Timothy Edward Jones
Swansea University
No man is not an exclusive term, it has long been used as shorthand for human. It is still useful so still used the same as the male is used for some other mammalian species, e.g. a pride of lions.
Cite
1 Recommendation
Asim Hakim Abbas
University of Al-Qadisiyah
Man is scientifically defined as the only living creature of the Homo or Anasian, the only intellect possessing a highly developed brain, who has the ability to abstract thought, pronunciation, use of language, internal self-reflection, and solutions to difficulties, unlike other animals on the surface Earth. In addition to this, the human body has a prosthesis containing the limbs of articular lower and upper to facilitate moving, these parties are fully consistent with the brain, and this unique property of the human being to be the only organism on the face of the human who is able to employ his physical and mental abilities in the manufacture of tools needed by Whatever its accuracy. Man is a social organism by its very nature. It has unique ways to use communication systems for self-expression, organization and exchange of ideas. It also has the ability to organize complex social structures in cooperation with competing and competing groups from family formation to nations. Human physiological and anatomical The human body is not much different from the bodies of other organisms on Earth's surface. Its body contains a huge number of cells that exceed billions, which form the necessary units for the life of organs in the human body. Human According to the philosophical perspective varied philosophical view of man and changed according to the development of human thought in general, was the concept of man according to Greek philosophy and according to the definition of Aristotle as a citizen of the state or city. According to Plato's philosophy, it was built between man and external objects in order to be able to strip him of his concrete positions. The human condition in general is characterized by two basic attributes. The first is the fact that the human condition is multifaceted in its dimensions and components. This gives it the quality of uniqueness in its richness and multiplicity. The mind, senses, conscience and others are all great powers that give special significance to it. The great powers of diversity in the abilities and strengths of the individual, man is a person or person capable of respecting the ethics and laws and complying with them. On the other hand, the human is a creative and creative because of his possession of the Queen of thought of the mind, and despite this, the concept of man or individual remains incomplete in terms of philosophical, because of the metaphysical dimension of the human self, which is characterized by a rationality possesses freedom and awareness and will, Law and truth are committed to all moral values, and this self continuously seeks to achieve the best in order to reach the desired goals and results in a sense of happiness.
Cite
1 Recommendation
عباس امير معارز الشمري
University of Al-Qadisiyah
Dear colleagues
My sincere greetings
Thank you for your kind answers
The clarifications were important to me, and they gave me scientific wealth, which I needed most
Thanks again
Cite
Kirk MacGregor
McPherson College
I would say that human beings are the only species that is partially determined and partially undetermined by its genetic makeup and the impact of its five senses. Humans can be understood as in the imago Dei by virtue of the fact that they have soft libertarian freedom: in some significant circumstances, humans have the ability to choose between alternatives. This is especially evident in the moral arena.
Cite
1 Recommendation
عباس امير معارز الشمري
University of Al-Qadisiyah
My sincere greetings
Thank you for your kind reply, dear professor
But do you agree with me that the future of genome research and its statements will be important in programming the biological free will of humans, means that it will threaten that will?
Yes, man is free within the religious idea, but how closely is the religious idea present with the religious idea in the future?
Greetings
Cite
Similar questions and discussions
Will this work only focus on Christianity?
Question
4 answers
Asked 26 June 2017
Abu Bakr Sirajuddin Cook
Will this work only focus on the various Christian traditions or is the breadth to incorporate other traditions? Most traditions incorporate an idea of a malevolent species of creatures that is broadly covered by the idea of demons, such as jinn, nagga, bunyips, spirits, etc. Muslim communities have a substantial body of literature and practice on exorcisms and there has been an increase of Islamic ruquya practice within non-Muslim countries. Is this something that this project will cover?
View
State funding of abortion in India ( and how it differs from HIndus, Muslims, Catholics, other religions) ?
Question
3 answers
Asked 20 April 2017
Deleted profile
I needed some help with this topic. This is for my psychology research paper. I wanted to know if there are any helpful links and/or ideas that anybody can help me with. Thank you.
View
Can anyone show me the way how to measure University students' religious fundamentalism?
Question
6 answers
Asked 21 October 2015
Kassahun Tilahun
I am conducting research on university students' religious fundamentalism and its implication to collaborative learning. Would you please pinpoint me the best way to measure religious fundamentalism?
View
Does anyone have information about contemporary Muslim cemeteries in Europe?
Question
10 answers
Asked 3 April 2013
Francesco Sacchetti
I've started to investigate rites, tradition, law, permission, about Muslim burial in contemporary Italy. I'm starting from an explorative sociological point of view. I'd like to compare my ongoing findings to European situations. Bibliography and articles suggestions are welcome.
View
Can one speak of "non bloody sacrifices", especially offering of cereals, in Buddhist popular rituals?
Question
30 answers
Asked 15 February 2013
Benoît Vermander
I am conducting a research on "wheat and religions", and am interested in cereal offerings in the larger context of defining the nature and rationale of non bloody sacrifices in different religious settings.
View
Genesis 1:28 Translation: Pherou wa rebou wa milla'ou, wa chi-beshuha wa redou b'...?
Discussion
5 replies
Asked 5 July 2023
Deleted profile
Some voices critique the usual English King James translation:
“And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”
The translation chi-beshua (usually subdue, bring under control) seems to be according to some voices contested (some say save, redeem is the meaning). Is the "save" translation credible?
How has the interpretation of Genesis 1:28 changed in the last 2000 years, e.g. Scholastic, Renaissance, etc.?
As it is a religious question, I do not want to touch any feelings and want to express that I highly respect religions. Agnostic approach, which may be wrong.
View
Can Motivation be a defense against descrimination? Say a person is hired with the argument that he is more motivated than other.
Question
5 answers
Asked 17 May 2017
Tariq Chaudhary
What I mean to know can a manager defend his decision of hiring a man instead of women by saying that man was more motivated than women.
View
How does the definition of religion used by Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map describe secularisation in the world today?
Question
6 answers
Asked 19 June 2016
Johan Lövgren
In their analysis of the World Value Survey Inglehart and Welzel describes a global secularization process. Here religion is connected with "national pride, respect for authority, obedience and marriage." How does this definition reflect modern religiosity?
http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp
View
How is Pentecostalism progressing in Africa?
Question
4 answers
Asked 16 June 2017
Mutabesha Bahizire
Pentecostalism is one of the biggest branches of contemporary christianity. In Africa we don't all have details. Christianisty is also the largest religion in the world, what about it in Africa?
View
Related Publications
Religião, cognição e as ciências do cérebro: uma introdução
Article
Mar 2017
Thales Moreira Maia Silva
Lucas Soares dos Santos
Embora a percepção popular comumente apresente um conflito intratável entre “Religião” e “Ciência”, o estudo acadêmico contemporâneo do fenômeno religioso vem mostrando como sua interseção pode ser positiva, unindo disciplinas das Ciências Humanas, Sociais e Naturais na tentativa de fornecer o relato mais completo possível, não somente na descrição...
View
Theosophy or Psychological Religion: The Gifford Lectures Delivered before the University of London in 1892
Book
Jan 2011
F. Max Müller
German-born Sanskritist and philologist Max Müller (1823-1900) was a pioneer in the field of comparative mythology and religion. Settling in England in 1846, during his distinguished career he served as Taylorian professor of modern European languages, curator of the Bodleian Library and Oxford's first professor of comparative philology. The conten...
View
Ciencias de las Religiones y teología: un diálogo necesario
Article
Full-text available
Dec 2021
Juan José Tamayo
Este artículo aborda el tema “Ciencias religiosas y teología: un diálogo necesario”. Para ello son necesarias la modestia, la apertura y la colaboración: (a) modestia en reconocer con honestidad intelectual el carácter provisional y los límites de la obra misma, sin, por tanto, desvalorizarla o considerarla irrelevante; (b) apertura para aceptar co...
View
Got a technical question?
Get high-quality answers from experts.
Ask a question
Top contributors to discussions in this field
Louis Brassard
Bob Skiles
State of Texas (retired)
Ljubomir Jacić
Technical College Požarevac
Mostafa G. M. Mostafa
Ain Shams University
Omer Elsabbagh
Independent researcher
Join ResearchGate to find the people and research you need to help your work
25+ million members
160+ million publication pages
2.3+ billion citations
Join for free
or
Discover by subject area
Recruit researchers
Join for free
LoginEmail Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login
PasswordForgot password?
Keep me logged in
Log in
or
Continue with Google
Welcome back! Please log in.
Email · HintTip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login