Dear colleagues,

I've been trying to do proliferation assays using HUVECs and at the beginning we were using 20 ng/mL of VEGF as it was recommended by a colleague. However, this colleague uses this growth factor as positive control for proliferation because she studies its signaling. In my case, I just want to see if the conditions that I'm using are better or worse than the positive control.

The problem is that I have worse results when adding something "good" to HUVECs than in my negative control and I can't grisp what is going on. So VEGF didn't work and I changed for EGM-2 (so the EBM media with bulletkit for Lonza) as it is rich in several growth factors, but it also didn't work. I keep having better proliferation rates at the cells in starvation (no growth factors, only 1% antibiotics) than in my (supposedly) positive control.

Does any of you have a suggestion? And if you know, could you explain to me why is this happening (I think it goes against logic)?

More Cláudia Oliveira's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions