Depending on different journal articles and some with method with clear designs and some without method section and still called as journal articles ( can be derived a lot from reputed publisher), this makes me perplexed with what the scientific articles or journal in social science ( not natural science). Professors , scholars and researchers help to clarify , thanks!
For me as a reader a research article is far more interesting with a method section. This does not mean that methods take more space than the actual subject.
I would not publish a research article without a section on methods. It is essential for verifying results. But I am not sure if this is established as a general rule.
I would like to thank for your contributions and they could be the testaments for searching for ongoing diachronic changes or trends of each disciple or what else behind.
Hello Doung Dara
Like Charles Berg , I would find those (with a Method) section much more interesting and I would definitely want a section like that in any original article with my name on it.
I would like to profoundly thank all of professors, Postdocs and academicians who took a glance over my questions. Additionally , I wish you could postulate or show your experience, which would insight for future research paths.
- Badges
- Science method