Comparing the identification of Culicidae through morphological characters with identification by molecular biology we can initially talk about cost. In addition some other points can be highlighted: the experience of the one who makes the identification and the cost of the tests and euipamentos. In practice, which is better? What are the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods?
António Maximiano Fernandes
It depends of study design and aim of study
If geographical distribution and density of vector, morphological characterization is better
If the geographical distribution correlated with epidemiological profile molecular biology is best
0 votes
0 thanks
Noor Idan Jarad
hello see this link may be help you
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › NCBI › Literature › PubMed Central (PMC)
0 votes
0 thanks
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Molecular Cell Biology
- Culture Cells
- Cell Line
More Fabiano Carvalho's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions