Dear colleague!
While there are many, the two that come to mind (and we utilise almost daily) are Qubit Fluorometery and TapeStation electrophoresis.
Qubit is a cheap and somewhat reliable way to quantify DNA using their ready made kits, and it measures light using fluorophores attached to DNA in a simple preparation step. It can also quantify DNA and proteins with specific kits. Qubit does have a rather low threshold for deeming a sample too low to read (0.050 ng/mL, I believe).
The second option would be Tapestation by Agilent, a machine that conducts a type of gel electrophoresis which not only provides you with quantification but also length of your amplicons/DNA.
The downside is that unless your lab already has Tapestation hardware then the price might be steep depending on your application.
Best Regards
Joakim
One of the methods for DNA quantification by spectrophotometer using nanodrop method which quantifies DNA, RNA and proteins also measures its purity but operater should be a skilled person.
Nanodrop is one of the best method(Which works on principle of spectrophotometer) to quantify the DNA samples and to check RNA and protein contamination.
But the integrity of DNA can't be verified using this method.
All methods based on light beam absorption or emission applies at a condition that provide a firm identification of DNA origin of the measured signal and thus enables a firm background and non-specific signal correction. The choice of method and instrument depends on your sample concentration and purity. If you are more concrete on that subject, I can provide a more specific information.
Nanodrop method is easy to know the concentration and purity of DNA,RNA and Protein.
DNA quantification is an important step in many molecular biology experiments, as it provides information about the concentration and quality of DNA samples. There are several methods available for DNA quantification, each with its own advantages and limitations. Here are some commonly used methods:
Spectrophotometry/UV-Vis Absorbance:
Advantages: Quick and simple, no specialized equipment required, non-destructive to the sample.
Limitations: Can measure total nucleic acid content but cannot differentiate between DNA and RNA. Impurities and contaminants can interfere with the measurement. Accuracy can be affected by the presence of protein or other molecules that absorb at the same wavelength as DNA.
Fluorometry:
Advantages: High sensitivity, specific for DNA, can differentiate between DNA and RNA if specific dyes are used.
Limitations: Requires a specialized fluorometer or plate reader, dyes may bind to other substances leading to false readings, accuracy can be affected by impurities and contaminants.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR):
Advantages: Highly sensitive and specific, can provide absolute quantification, can measure specific DNA targets, can detect low DNA concentrations, real-time results.
Limitations: Requires specific primers and probes for the target DNA, requires a qPCR machine, can be affected by PCR inhibitors, amplification efficiency can vary, limited to known DNA sequences.
Digital PCR (dPCR):
Advantages: Highly precise and sensitive, absolute quantification, can detect rare DNA variants or low DNA concentrations, less affected by PCR inhibitors, no requirement for standard curves.
Limitations: Requires specialized equipment, higher cost per sample compared to other methods, limited to known DNA sequences.
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis:
Advantages: Can provide qualitative information about DNA concentration, size, and purity, relatively low cost.
Limitations: Cannot provide accurate quantification, limited sensitivity, cannot differentiate between DNA and RNA, requires a separate DNA ladder for estimation.
NanoDrop Spectrophotometry:
Advantages: Quick and simple, measures nucleic acid concentration and purity, minimal sample volume required.
Limitations: Similar limitations as spectrophotometry, accuracy can be affected by impurities and contaminants, can overestimate concentration due to the presence of contaminants.
Fluorescence-based assays:
Advantages: High sensitivity, specific for DNA, can measure double-stranded or single-stranded DNA, can be used with fluorescent microplate readers.
Limitations: Requires specialized equipment, specific dyes or probes, can be affected by impurities and contaminants.
Good evening.
There are 4 methods that come to mind. I'll give them to you in order of importance for quantifying DNA.
1. Spectrometry based on UV absorbance: the Nanodrope (spectrophotometer) is currently the most widely used.
Advantages :
- Uses just 1 microLiter of sample, with no need to use other reagents or solutions;
- Wide range, from 0.2 to 27500 ng/microLiter;
- allows analysis of DNA purity, and identification of contaminants such as proteins, phenol...
- Corrects absorbance.
Nucleic acid concentration measured with Nanodrop is more precise and reliable.
2. Fluorescence-based fluorometry: the Cubit.
- More sensitive than spectrophotometry, with a sensitivity of the order of pg/microLiter;
- is more specific; but is not affected by the presence of contaminants in the nucleic acid solution, i.e. purity is not examined;
- it is interesting when the solution contains DNA and RNA, as it enables them to be quantified specifically;
- it requires other reagents for its use.
3. qPCR
You'll notice that it gives you results after the event, i.e. after polymerization.
4. Gel electrophoresis: agarose gel. Here, after conventional PCR, the results are read on a gel.
N.B.: - the best method for quantifying DNA is the Nanodrop (micro-volume spectrophometer);
- methods 3 and 4 should be used if you don't have 1 or 2.
I hope you find my contribution useful. Best regards!
I usually recommend the Qubit. The Qubit uses an intercalating fluorescent dye that increases fluorescence upon binding to a specific target. This specific targeting allows for greater accuracy and specificity when compared to a Nanodrop or other UV-VIS spectroscopy instruments. The Qubit is also more sensitive and works better for low-concentration samples. The Qubit does not give you a 260/280 ratio (purity measurement), though. It also takes a bit more time to set up. It's not a bad idea to use both. Just don't be surprised if your numbers don't exactly match.
There are several methods, and they each have pros and cons: UV Absorbance, Fluorescence Dyes, Gel Electrophoresis, Capillary Electrophoresis, Diphenylamine Method, HPLC, etc. See the following article for more details: https://lab.plygenind.com/what-are-the-methods-to-quantify-dna
- Badges
- Science method