This is because papers and researches uploaded on RG, without being accepted for publication in journals or conferences, are not reviewed.
Is there any other point of view ?
We must understand that RG is an academic exposure, sharing and learning platform and not a publication hob. Thus we must published our papers in peer reviewed journals before uploading them on RG for international readership, appreciation and citation. Kind regards
Manuscripts uploaded in RG are not effectively published. The statement 'This is because papers and researches published in RG, without being accepted for publication in journals or conferences, are not reviewed' is not true. Papers published in many predatory journals never go through the review process yet they are cited.
I agree with Subir. Taxonomically this is not an effective publication, nor validly published.
RG is not a publication platform; rather it is a communication medium and a display centre. Thus, there is no possibility and for that matter, question of "papers published in RG" arise!
We must understand that RG is an academic exposure, sharing and learning platform and not a publication hob. Thus we must published our papers in peer reviewed journals before uploading them on RG for international readership, appreciation and citation. Kind regards
Kindly see the given link too.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_publishing
OSF, a similar site, reviews all papers sent to it. Effectively they then get an academic OK.
I agree with Dickson Adom. RG is not a publication plattform. It is a plattform where researchers and teachers exchange research and teaching ideas.
Best wishes,
Litart
This is true for some papers, but you can see the accepted papers from RG. It depends on which papers you are reading.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publisher