President-elect Trump has proposed eliminating the U.S. Department of Education. What would be the impact, if any, on higher education in the United States?
What are the main benefits? What are the main drawbacks?
In addition, losing this federal funds will give colleges/universities more opportunities/room to increase their quota of accepting/admitting foreign students to their institutions as well. More money and more opportunities for foreign students to be able to successfully achieve their dream American education. Also, losing this federal funds means losing the educational funds for poor American young adult learners who cannot afford to finance their higher education aspirations.
Trump’s policies are set to reshape global academic flows
United States President Donald Trump’s second term looks set to accelerate an academic brain drain. If current trends hold, the country could see a long-term decline in its ability to attract top international talent, while the United Kingdom and Europe solidify their positions as leading global academic hubs...
The financial shackling of historically Black universities in the United States
Evolutionary biologist Joseph L. Graves Jr argues that — now more than ever — the United States should honour its commitments to Black higher education to diversify the science workforce...
Trump’s policies threaten HE access efforts around the world
Donald Trump’s attempts to weaken the United States Department of Education, which administers student aid and other programmes intended to improve higher education access, may have an impact beyond US borders as some political parties across the world attempt to replicate his brand of authoritarian, right-wing populism...
The question of dismantling the U.S. Department of Education raises profound reflections about the architecture of education governance - not just in the U.S., but globally.
From an international perspective, centralized educational bodies serve both symbolic and functional roles: they set shared standards, protect equity of access, and ensure minimum quality thresholds across diverse institutions.
The potential elimination of such a body could create greater autonomy for individual states and institutions, fostering innovation in some regions. However, it could also deepen existing inequalities, fragment policy coherence, and erode collective accountability - particularly affecting marginalized groups who historically relied on federal protections.
In the realm of higher education, where global competition and credential comparability are critical, the absence of a national framework might make American institutions more vulnerable to disparities in recognition and funding on the international stage.
Beyond structural impacts, I believe there is a deeper philosophical question: What vision of education do we collectively uphold - one driven by the invisible hand of the market, or one guided by a shared commitment to public good and human flourishing?
Thank you for raising such a vital and globally relevant discussion.
More colleges shuttered their doors in the US in 2024 than ever before, and universities in other parts of the world face a similar concern. Why are universities are closing, and what happens when they do?
The reality is, colleges and universities across America have been impacted by shifts in demographics, declining enrolment, and rising costs…