There has been much criticism of teleological perfectionism, a concept of perfectionism defended by many scholars of philosophy, and much criticized by others. I need to know how far relevant is this idea to apply it to modern aspects of organizational work culture and adaptation, since, modern knowledge-organizations have acknowledged perfectionism as one of the variables of organizational routines and performance appraisal. Spinoza, Hegel, and Nietzsche expressed their views which related to perfectionism, and as such, how far this concept is correct?
Today, human excellence is gradually being overtaken and outstripped by machine excellence, and modern hi-tech industry thrives on automation and perfection. It has now become more of an objective criteria or determinant rather than a subjective one which it used to be so when human excellence and perfectionism were once considered the pillars of human endurance and success. What are your views?
Persons embedded in organizations,communities, culture are involved in teleogical scenarios which give content and structure to those organizations,communities, culture.these personal teleogies are influenced by specific contexts organizational,communal, cultural immersion.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Physiology
- Biosignals
- Biomedical Signal Processing
- Statistical Analysis