Any publication and journal have to be carefully selected.

The spectrum of opportunities has definitely widened,

but also the danger of damaging your 'web-putation'.

Any publication and journal have to be carefully selected.

The spectrum of opportunities has definitely widened,

but also the danger of damaging your 'web-putation'.

Some open access journal charge very high article processing charge, in such a case publishing in any open access journal may be alternative as the findings can be easily disseminated to wider community.

Nowadays compromising with quality of publication will damage one's academic reputation. University Grants Commission (UGC), India's higher education regulatory and funding agency, is very harsh on predatory journals.

Partially agree because quality journals should be first target and if any problem and you want your findings to reach early than you can go to OAJ

I disagree. The fact is that it is unclear who and how will determine this quality. And judges who? Let me give you a simple and clear example. Albert Einstein's article "on the electrodynamics of moving media" would not have been published if the editors had listened to the reviewers ' estimates. If you listen to them, nothing new will ever be published. All new reviewers will evaluate either as quackery or as pseudoscience.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions

Almost all the Sciences that today constitute the flower of science and the basis of the power of States were once considered pseudosciences. This is nuclear physics, genetics and Cybernetics. And some are now considered pseudosciences, such as alchemy. And this is despite the fact that the transformation of elements in fast neutron nuclear reactors is carried out on an industrial scale. If in due time articles in these directions were not accepted by zealots of quality of scientific journals, these Sciences would not exist now.

Article PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF THE THEORY AND THE METHODOLOGY OF ...

Article FORMATION OF THE SUBJECTIVE (VIRTUAL) MODELS OF PHYSICAL AND...

Article THE PRINCIPLES AND THE PROSPECTS OF CORRECT CONTENT INTERPRE...

The Jesuits also fought for the quality of the faith. We know what methods and what it led to. The fighters for the quality of science are the modern Jesuits. They send modern Giordano Bruno to the stake without a blink of an eye

Thank you Eugene Veniaminovich Lutsenko , Arvind Singh Manmohan J.R. Dobriyal Stephen I. Ternyik for participating in this discussion.

Quality is difficult to judge, difficult to ascertain, even very difficult to define but always to consider.

One must publish his quality work only in high impact factor SCI/SCOPUS Indexed journals.

Avoid publications in predatory journals.

It is not the place that makes the man, but the man the place. Although...

Selection of Journal depends upon quality of work.