Is the core idea of the article "On the Relativity of the Speed of Light" really difficult to understand?
When writing this paper, I followed the unspoken rule that they should tactfully question the wrong theories of celebrities, so the real point of view is relatively hidden. After so many years, some scientists still do not correctly understand the core idea of this article:
"The Lorentz transformation is not wrong, but it was completely misinterpreted by Einstein, who lacked basic mathematical knowledge and basic logical knowledge. See the paper: Preprint On the Relativity of the Speed of Light
If Einstein's explanation is valid, then there must be a complete space-time transformation that Einstein should have thought of but ignored. Such a deduction of complete space-time transformation in the sense of relativity denies the invariance of the relative speed of light, which is the focus of relativity. Some people angrily say that Einstein is actually very ignorant, which may be true. The root cause of the world's carnival in the theory of relativity lies in the simple charm of ignorant imagination. The so-called exact solution of the Dirac equation that the textbook promotes the success of the important application of relativity in quantum mechanics is also completely wrong! The correct exact solution has been given in part, see Mathematics & Nature 3 (https://mathnature.github.io/, 2022). It is absurd, then, that a false conclusion should be claimed to have been extensively tested experimentally.”
That article is completly wrong.
Einstein himself is the main responsible for SR.
There is a template that answers your question correctly:
Your brain is completely useless, Dr. Alcmaeon himself is the pioneer of brain anatomy.
And here is a new thought experiment, "Einstein's Cat", which proves (again) anti-relativists wrong!
https://youtu.be/PFh_OQMwKmU
V. G. Rousseau
My god! Do you understand mathematics?
Relativity is just a pure mathematical game. Its premise is incorrect, and many experiments claim to prove relativity, which are purely lies for the sake of fame and fortune.
30 years ago, I wrote a book manuscript that gradually overturned the assumptions, inferences, and experiments of special relativity.
Several years ago, I wrote three papers proving that the LIGO team was lying, leaving the global scientific community speechless. They had to pretend they had never read my paper.
I still have sufficient evidence to refute the fundamental principles of general relativity.
But the entire scientific world is nothing but fools howling day and night in the game hall. And these fools have no morality.
I have no interest in accelerating the writing of mathematical and scientific papers and publishing them online recently.
Today, an Einstein cat appeared. Once I find out that Einstein cat is a fucking fake cat, Einstein dog will appear tomorrow. Groups of dogs barking incessantly, their voices so loud, you should know, right? Think about it, a person who strives to suppress the barking of hundreds of thousands of dogs with their single voice is clearly not a hero!
X. D. Dongfang
It is so enjoyable to see how proving you wrong makes you suffer!
Keep crying: https://youtu.be/PFh_OQMwKmU
V. G. Rousseau
You should know that I only go to refute those highly influential lies and absurd theories. Those opinions without any influence, such as the small rotten shrimp in the ocean, let the bigger fish swallow them up. I am not concerned about the relativistic errors that the vast majority of high school students have sufficient ability to prove.
X. D. Dongfang
Go see a psychiatrist, and don't forget to tell him about your fake credentials.
V. G. Rousseau
A theory that was originally completely wrong can now be proven to be completely wrong by middle school students through basic mathematical knowledge. However, relying on decades of crazy memorization, you are losing more and more basic mathematical knowledge, just endlessly shouting that you have not found any errors. This is a mental illness.
It is believed that psychologists cannot cure your irreversible mental illness.
X. D. Dongfang
"It is believed that psychologists cannot cure your irreversible mental illness."
Says the guy who talks about himself in the 3rd person on Quora...
Go see a psychiatrist!
V. G. Rousseau
Previously, I somewhat regarded you as a scientist, although like the vast majority of mediocre scientists, you could not make groundbreaking discoveries. But your later behavior, to be honest, doesn't look like a scientist at all. Ah, not even mediocre. What do you think?
I have told you many times that I do not have English listening and speaking skills, although I can read and write in English. You bring an English video hoping that I can refute you. This is beyond both my language ability and my current life scope.
Then, you use the method of provocation again. You should know that I have walked more bridges than you have walked roads. Don't play tricks anymore. You can argue with one of physics PhDs to come to the correct conclusion about your question. Is it necessary to be unreasonable like this?
X. D. Dongfang
"But your later behavior, to be honest, doesn't look like a scientist at all."
And yet, I have over 60 publications in high-quality peer-reviewed journals, while you don't have a single one.
Go see a psychiatrist, poor arrogant crackpot!
V. G. Rousseau
You seem to have not learned linguistics well. Because your wording is so inaccurate. You should say:
There are over 60 lie articles with the name V. G. Rousseau, and that's me. Those articles have appeared in influential journals. X.D. Dongfang, if you insist on not writing lie articles, your name will never appear in influential journals. "
Let's take a look at what kind of people control scientific journals:Article The End of Euler Proof of Cubic Fermat Last Theorem
The scientific community of this era is just a stage for scammers. Scammers fabricate one lie after another, they control influential journals and take pride in it.
This is a serious mental illness. You should go to a psychiatric hospital. Staying there and not coming out again is the only correct choice for you in life.
X. D. Dongfang
"There are over 60 lie articles with the name V. G. Rousseau"
You don't even know what these articles are about, and should you know you wouldn't be able to understand them. So, you claiming that they are lies is another proof that you are a liar and using the argument of authority. Besides, with your fakes and/or non-existent credentials, you don't even have any authority.
Poor crackpot!
V. G. Rousseau
Sorry. I have read one of your articles and understand your habitual thinking, and have already pointed out that your article is not authentic. You are required to pay a labor fee of $100000 to obtain the overturning process, but you are unwilling. Because those articles have little impact. I only overturn influential theories for free. Overthrowing lies that have little impact is not free. Do you understand?
The scientific community today is dominated by anti science elements. People who possess truth establish journals that publish scientific truths. credentials? Anti science activists blame the public disclosure of new great scientific truths for not being certified by anti science groups, and therefore can completely defame these scientific truths. This is a joke!
X. D. Dongfang
"I have read one of your articles and understand your habitual thinking, and have already pointed out that your article is not authentic."
So far, you haven't even been able to tell which article of mine you are referring to, which strongly suggest that you are just full of shit.
"You are required to pay a labor fee of $100000 to obtain the overturning process"
I never had to paid a single fee to publish my articles. All corrupted journals (like Physics Essays) require you to pay fees in exchange of a biased peer-reviewed acceptance.
"Because those articles have little impact."
LOL. If you are too lazy to get informed, I suggest that you simply ask ChatGPT if "Physical Review Letters" has a good impact factor. FYI, I have 10 papers in that journal, and 50 others in other high-quality journals. As a reminder, you have none.
Go see a psychiatrist!
V. G. Rousseau
Don't mention Phyiscal Review Letters.
15 years ago, I sent my paper to them. They told me that it is not allowed to point out any errors in the papers published in the Phyiscal Review series journals, they only publish theories that develop the papers already published in these journals. This means that physical theories must continue to develop according to the erroneous aspects they specify. Do you know the reason for your success now?
Are you going to see their ghosts? I still have their emails. But is it useful to condemn them--- No...
X. D. Dongfang
"They told me that it is not allowed to point out any errors in the papers published in the Phyiscal Review series journals"
You are blatantly lying (again)!
V. G. Rousseau
Yes, they won't say it explicitly, but the meaning is like this. "Only publish papers that develop theories of the Physical Review series journals". Your language comprehension ability is very poor. Obviously, this is evidence that you cannot make groundbreaking discoveries. Of course, as long as you live well, it's enough. May everyone in the world live better than me.
V. G. Rousseau
There is a great journal: https://www.mathnature.net/. If you can write papers of equivalent level, then you are a promising scientist. Otherwise, you can only continue to be mediocre like this.
From now on, don't argue about boring things. Can you introduce what groundbreaking discoveries you have that could potentially impact the scientific community for 500 years in the future? For example, the elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem? A macroscopic and microscopic unified quantum theory? The completeness theory of partial differential equations?
X. D. Dongfang
"There is a great journal: https://www.mathnature.net/. If you can write papers of equivalent level, then you are a promising scientist. Otherwise, you can only continue to be mediocre like this."
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Here is what a simple Google search returns after asking "Is "Mathematics & Nature" a good journal?":
"Mathematics and Nature" is not a reputable academic journal; it's a personal webpage of X. D. Dongfang containing unrefereed papers, not a peer-reviewed publication.
Poor arrogant crackpot. You are reminiscent of a dog licking his balls!
V. G. Rousseau
It seems that you appreciate the despicable behavior of anti science elements. There is a Chinese saying that goes: Birds of a feather flock together, like people. Everything goes naturally.
X. D. Dongfang
Keep fleeing and trying to hide all your lies, coward!
You do realize that you are making a fool of yourself in front of the entire web, right?
If you had an epsilon of honor, you would delete all your posts, and possibly change your name with the hope that everybody would forget about you.
V. G. Rousseau
There are millions of people around the world who rely on lying articles to become professors like you. Lying people dominate the scientific community. They use their own style of lying to defame the greatest discoverer of our time, with the aim of hindering the development of science and maximizing personal interests. X. D. Dongfang, this glorious name, because it carries unparalleled groundbreaking discoveries in mathematics and physics, will forever shine like the sun in the long river of human history, as long as humanity does not perish.
"X. D. Dongfang, this glorious name, because it carries unparalleled groundbreaking discoveries in mathematics and physics, will forever shine like the sun in the long river of human history, as long as humanity does not perish."
LOL
I'm taking a screenshot of this and I will post it to this webpage when I will have time: https://bluemoonshine.fun/Project-Pseudo-Scientists.php
Could you send me a profile picture? It would be even better!
V. G. Rousseau
Thank you for finally returning to humanity, ready to promote the greatest pioneering discoverer of our time who has been hated and defamed by the scientific community. As for great photos, let's skip them. The scientific community needs great truths, not photos of people who discover them.
V. G. Rousseau
Your tricks are quite numerous. However, as someone who has published over 60 articles in those so-called top-tier journals—which are notorious for their "core purpose of publishing lies"—and thus became a tenured professor, you still cannot gain even a single step of advantage over a grassroots scientist who is ruthlessly suppressed by mainstream academics out of sheer jealousy. This is truly embarrassing for you.
X. D. Dongfang
"As for great photos, let's skip them."
Oh yes, cowardice is taking over you, and you don't want people to know who is the crackpot they are going to laugh at...
V. G. Rousseau
Thank you for your interest, but I must decline. While I am unafraid of death, I still have many groundbreaking discoveries that will undoubtedly influence the scientific community for the next thousand years. It would be unnecessary to risk premature harm from the CIA, NSA, or FBI before these findings are made public.
Dear Prof. V. G. Rousseau ，do you have any other tricks to play?
V. G. Rousseau
Although President Trump's absolute intelligence is highly respected, his ambition to "Make America Great Again," which inevitably leads to suppressing anything or anyone stronger than America, is something that the great pioneering discoverer, who appears only once in centuries, should be wary of.
Dear Prof. V. G. Rousseau ，do you have any other tricks to play?
X. D. Dongfang
Sending me anonymous messages via my personal website and putting a temporary email address for the response is another instance of your cowardice. It is also an instance of your lack of intelligence, given that it only sufficed me to reply to that address in order to receive a response in Chinese. Given that you are the only Chinese guy who is attacking me, you have been clearly identified.
COWARD!
V. G. Rousseau
Chinese attack you? Or do you attack the Chinese? Please provide examples to illustrate.
X. D. Dongfang
So, you are not denying that it was you. You've been caught!
V. G. Rousseau
Refer to a post about you: https://tieba.baidu.com/p/9596694176
A very friendly promotion for you, but you don't know how to repay kindness. Your thinking is not conventional. No wonder you keep blindly shouting, 'The theory of relativity is too correct'.
X. D. Dongfang
Well, it won't take long for people who don't know you yet to understand that you are the one who is stupid.
V. G. Rousseau
Waiting for news of your victory.
Another question, do you really understand quantum mechanics?
In 2022, papers on overturning the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics have been compiled: https://www.mathnature.net/page2022.html ；
In 2025, a series of papers on the elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem are organizing ;
By 2026, papers on overturning special relativity and general relativity will be compiled.
Do you want to be less foolish? You still have one more year's chance, seize it!
X. D. Dongfang
"In 2022, papers on overturning the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics have been compiled: https://www.mathnature.net/page2022.html"
I don't read non-peer-reviewed articles that are posted on the unreliable website that you mentioned, and which is well-known for promoting crack-pottery.
V. G. Rousseau
The wisdom in these papers surpasses the foolish mainstream scientific community. Nowadays, artificial intelligence can conduct peer reviews. You upload the papers to AI, and they can verify the logic. Yet, the foolish mainstream scholars are incapable of commenting on such accurately calculated papers. Aren't you a physics professor who understands quantum mechanics? Do you still need to listen to what peer reviewers have to say? Do you realize that they are often just students—usually, professors hand the papers over to students for review. Do you only ever read the abstracts of papers? Gossiping professor?
V. G. Rousseau
One of my students once pursued a degree in the United States. When he was still a student, there was a period of time when he had to receive instructions from his professor every week to conduct peer review of manuscripts for the Physics Review series of journals. I have pointed out that the documents he reviewed and approved were actually incorrect. He remained silent. I don't understand why you can't read mathematical calculation papers on your own and need to listen to students' review opinions? Are you a lazy professor? I know that situations around the world are similar.
Later on, I no longer read any papers in the Physical Review series of journals, and I will not read any more in the future.
This is going to make you cry again, but here is my new paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17248
I'll let you suffer in peace... LOL
Thank you for sharing. The paper has been collected. I am currently focusing on the elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. Physics issues, temporarily put aside.
"When faced with overwhelming evidence supporting the reality of time dilation, confirmed in particular by the Hafele-Keating experiment, some anti-relativists reluctantly concede that time dilation applies to light clocks. However, they argue that the Theory of Relativity remains flawed, claiming that time dilation applies to light clocks only, not to massive objects. They assert that atomic clocks, which operate based on microwave radiation, merely create the illusion that the Hafele-Keating experiment confirms the theory. To refute this misconception, we introduce a thought experiment inspired by Schr¨odinger’s cat, in which the fate of Einstein’s cat depends on a “Sync-or-Die clock”, an imaginary device that tests the synchronization between a light clock and a mechanical clock, potentially triggering the release of poison. By analyzing this scenario from both the inertial frame where the device is at rest and another in which it moves at constant velocity, we demonstrate that time dilation must apply to the mechanical clock in exactly the same way as it does to the light clock, highlighting the universality of relativistic time dilation." by V. G. Rousseau
——————————————————
"Any hypothetical conditions or assumed environments cannot be utilized to prove any proposition or its negation. Truth constitutes its own system; human consciousness cannot distort natural phenomena, but it can describe natural phenomena in a distorted manner. If a hypothesis is true, it can be proven that it is no longer a hypothesis, and an unprovable hypothesis or a hypothesis based on perjury is the hypothesis. " by X. D. Dongfang
V. G. Rousseau
While your dedication to academia is commendable, as a physicist who lacks even a basic understanding of mathematics, you remain largely ignored—even if you were to publish a thousand papers in so-called 'top-tier' journals. It’s as if you’ve conjured up some 'Einsteinian cat' that blindly endorses every one of your delusions. Frankly, your work is the kind even Physical Review Letters—a journal that takes pride in peddling falsehoods—would dismiss with scorn. But congratulations, Professor, on your singular talent for self-congratulation!
X. D. Dongfang
My level in math is way above yours. Come back when you will understand, for instance, these two peer-reviewed and published papers:
Article Superfluid density in continuous and discrete spaces: Avoidi...
- http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.056707
- Badges
- Science method