A manifesto published by the scientific journal Nature, says that science is going through a stage of low credibility because many of the studies and scientific experiments lack 'reproducibility', the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to replicate or reproduce on subsequent investigations, either by independent researchers or by the original researchers themselves. What do you think about this ?
One wonders therefore whether it is possible to infer from such overwhelming silence consent that the statement is true.
It could be, but I think it is a matter of originality, and if the investigation is important and dealing with significant knowledge it should be reproduced in a certain way but it has its own conditions.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publisher