- Only Journals make money from the articles we have worked on for years.
- Academics do not earn money from their refereeing.
- Then shouldn't the solution be a system in which academics can earn money?
The New Face of the Academy, data owners are not earning their rigths
www.rawdatalibrary.net
Academia Sevican Kurt was and is always part of an economic system; your link shows an alternative conception of the economic assembly line in academic work, i.e. informatization.
Academics often can't earn the money they deserve due to:
Stephen I. Ternyik Chuck A Arize
More than one output is obtained from an academic study. In published articles, generally some of them can be presented and discussed. In some of the related publications, outputs are only mentioned, but no data are presented.
In the published articles, the data are presented as a summarized table or graphically. This makes it difficult to reuse the data by other researchers.
Many of the outputs mentioned in the relevant articles (for example: graphical representations) cannot be presented due to the page limit. It may not be possible to present survey data or provide graphs of all the results.
Obtained results are presented as a graph or a two points in the table
As shown in the figure, there is more than one data that needs to be taken into account from point Ato point B.
Raw data are needed in order for the articles obtained from scientific studies to be sustainable and for the validation and comparisons of previously obtained data to be evaluated with different parameters.
That’s why I supported RDL to sell our data, models.
Some academics lack resources to pursue higher education. Scholarships and grants can help, but overall funding remains a challenge.
Chuck A Arize Thats why I think Raw Data Library is better than other platforms by providing academic incentive.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Graphs