How can we determine which pathogen (bacteria, fungi, virus) is responsible for a given plant disease from a phenotypic observation (for example: spots, smudges on leaves) ??
All instrumental methods can be applied for the pathogen identification (microscopic analysis, wet chamber, pure culture isolation, artificial inoculation tests, biochemical tests like LOPAT for Pseudomonas, ELISA, FAME, PCR, LAMP, DNA sequencing, MALDI), but they are quite far from the simple phenotypic observation.
The task of the disease identification by image analysis can be done with one of many expert systems based on PC or mobile phone. If you look for way to do it by visual observation, I would say that you need many years of work in field plant pathology.
Usually, you can find watering spot or bacteria ooze on the leaves if the disease caused by bacteria, and symptom with mycelium or sporophore with black, white, yellow, gray colours usually means disease caused by fungi.
All instrumental methods can be applied for the pathogen identification (microscopic analysis, wet chamber, pure culture isolation, artificial inoculation tests, biochemical tests like LOPAT for Pseudomonas, ELISA, FAME, PCR, LAMP, DNA sequencing, MALDI), but they are quite far from the simple phenotypic observation.
I agreed Dr. Alex. For identification of plant pathogen, we need to follow Koch’s postulates by artificial inoculation to confirm the suspected pathogen is present or not. http://www.life.umd.edu/classroom/bsci424/BSCI223WebSiteFiles/KochsPostulates.htm
After confirmation, biochemical or molecular studies were performed for detailed studies on species level.
External symptoms are generally related with various pattern of pigment loss, stunting and deformity of plant or plant part, sometimes association of spores, conidia, fruiting bodies in case of fungi , eggs or larvae in case of insect or nematode. For confirmation microscopic observation may help.
16S rRNA sequencing is good for new bacteria identification, and antibiotic resistance (and other biochemical) tests are good for evaluation of bacterial plant pathogens diversity. Detection and diagnostics of the most expected pathogens can be done in rare case by phenotype (I agree with Prof. Rekha Arya - some diseases have distinct traits and microscopic observation may help a lot for fungi or nematodes), but, it is better to use PCR or IFA (ELISA) for virus or bacteria identification. Virus diseases are especially harmful in mixture of two or more species (like PVY+PVX or PVM, TuMV+CaMV, etc.), and bacteria have rapid succession of major components - specific pathogens are succeeded by soft rot pathogens or by semi-pathogenic bacteria.
Every pathogen has its own specific symptoms. e.g. some plant viruses produced typical symptoms (like begomovirus produced leaf curling, yellow veins, mosaic yellow pattern, leaf deformation, enation, vein thickening, vein swelling) so this appearance we assumed the disease may be caused by begomovirus. Further confirmation is also done by using diagnostic tools like PCR, Blots, ELISA etc.
Carry a study on the physical manifestation of the disease pathogen*bacterial*fungi*virus* and *nematode in relation to the distinct characteristics and later *Koch's Postulate* for disease diagnostic. Agnes Wakesho Mwang'ombe
I agree with all valuable responder opinion. However, it is difficult to explain your question with a few words here. I suggest you to have a look plant pathologists’ constitution book (Plant Pathology edited by Agrios).