It is possible as only the force is equivalent. But because of heterogeneity, 0 deg ply will take more load while 90 ply takes less load. You might want to try SwiftComp, a general-purpose composite modeling software freely accessible in the cloud at https://cdmhub.org/resources/scstandard.
It comes down to how you've applied the traction at the boundary:
1. If you've applied it as a load per unit length (1 MPa *1mm):
Since the laminate is symmetric, (there is no bend-stretch coupling) you would see this load redistribute itself amongst the individual laminae based on their stiffnesses (as Prof. Yu describes). The total internal stress resultant = 1.65MPa*4/7 + 0.133MPa*3/7 =~ 1 will equal the total applied load per unit length = 1MPa*1. This is of course assuming that the stress is uniform within each lamina depth (as I presume it would be). I get these stress values from the graph you've attached.
A quick check for this is to plot the strain profile through the thickness: it should be constant through the depth. This is similar to the case of having 7 springs in parallel attached to a rigid bar onto which is applied a load of 1MPa*1mm*100mm. This load would simply redistribute amongst the 7 springs such that each spring extends the same amount (because of symmetry of the structure)
The 1 MPa that you talk about at the edge would be an "average" representation of the stress through the laminate. It's similar to replacing the laminate with a single layer and asking what the stress would be in that layer (for a statically equivalent case).
The crux is this: For equilibrium, the net internal FORCE must equal the external force. (NOT stresses).
Another check is the Q11 values of the 0 and 90 deg layers. Since, the strains are constant through the depth, the stresses in each layer would simply be Q11*strain. So the ratio of stresses in the 0 and 90 deg layers would be equal to the ratio of Q11 in each layer.
2. You've applied the traction as an "outward pressure" (Force/area) :
In this case, you've applied a traction of 1MPa on each lamina, so the internal stresses must equal the applied loads at the interface.
I doubt this is the case. I have a feeling you've modeled the laminate as a single shell (probably the mid-plane) and provided the material properties of each layer as a "section assignment". So you might have specified the traction as a load/length on the edge, corresponding to case 1 above.