This is a rhetorical question, as I´ll give an answer. I get asked questions through research gate messaging from time to time or I see questions on RG where I feel that I have the know how and experience to give a relevant answer.

However, it seems too few people read this: https://explore.researchgate.net/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=14155852

What bothers me is that often questions are asked that the person could answer through a little search on google or research gate. Often other people have asked a similar question or had a similar problem - so the answer is already out there. In other cases, the questions concern basic application of techniques or trouble shooting techniques that are very well documented (e.g. qPCR, western blot etc..).

So before asking a question, why not make the effort to find the answer yourself? Of course it´s faster to ask someone who knows; but then please start with your PI. If this is not possible for whatever reason, ask the internet. If you are still not sure how to interpret a result, THEN at least you´ll have an idea of what information needs to be provided with your question to get your question answered.

Where to ask? In the public questions section or directly by messaging someone? I would say, always ask in the public questions section of RG. If you get no reply or if you want the reply from someone specific - copy the question link and invite the person by sending a message with the link and saying why you want their input. Why ask in public questions section? Because there will probably be many people who had the same problem and can help you and in the future there may be other people who will have the same question and they will be happy to find answers to it.

If you ask a question: take the time to write a good question and to provide all the required info and if possible an image. e.g. if your blot looks weird with a certain antibody and you have no clue what the problem may be-give as much info as possible: e.g. which organism, which tissue, how the sample was prepared (buffer, temperatures, which inhibitors were added?) protein amount loaded on XX % gel, gel system (classic laemmli...), blotting conditions, membrane type, mass of the protein in question, antibody (product and lot number of commercial antibodies) and an image of the blot.

THE same holds true for answering. I try not to give speculative answers. If the info I need to answer the question is missing, I try to ask for that info. Otherwise, it´ll be just an accumulation of speculation. Also, I often see that people just "repeat" answers already given a few post up. Please read all answers and only contribute NEW or ADDITIONAL input, or write if a certain answer was very helpful if you want to give further support to it.

FINALLY - after getting answers, vote up answers that helped and "close" the question with writing what solved the problem. This will be very helpful for someone who has the same question/problem in the future.

Hope this spreads a little bit. I think this research gate question section is very useful. But it should not be overused for quick and lazy asking of questions that could be easily answered by a PI or by checking the internet.

More Christoph Metzendorf's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions