I am currently conducting research on shrimp stock assessment, and I am utilizing the ‘TropFishR’ Package to analyze a dataset containing monthly carapace length frequency data. The accurate calculation of natural mortality is essential for my analysis of the exploitation rate and other critical factors. In the ‘TropFishR’ package, there are several methods available for calculating shrimp mortality, including Alverson and Carney (1975), Hoenig (1983) - Joint Equation, Hoenig (1983) - Fish Equation, Pauly (1980) - Length Equation, Then (2015) – tmax, Then (2015) – growth, and other techniques.

However, the majority of these methods have been previously utilized for fish total length and standard length, which was not problematic. When I applied Then (2015) – growth and Pauly (1980) - Length Equation, two of the most widely used methods for calculating natural mortality, to the carapace length of shrimps, which is 3 to 6 times shorter than the total length, I observed abnormally high natural mortality rates.

To overcome this issue, I calculated the total length of the shrimp using a regression relationship between total length and carapace length, which allowed me to recalculate the natural mortality. Unfortunately, the calculated values still remained high (>2), with the exception of Alverson and Carney (1975) and Hoenig (1983) - Joint Equation methods, which yielded natural mortality rates of approximately 1.7.

I would greatly appreciate any suggestions or recommended articles that may assist me in addressing this issue.

Similar questions and discussions