I recommend that the SC 50 value calculations.). In the presence of antioxidants, the purple colour of DPPH decays, and the change of absorbance is monitored at 517 nm against reagent and sample blank. Briefly, 0.75 mL of a 0.1 mM DPPH in methanol was mixed with equal volume of methanolic honey extracts, and incubated in dark for 50 min, and absorbance was measured at 517 nm in the presence of different concentration of samples (0.1-10 mg/mL). Radical scavenging activity of DPPH was expressed as SC50, which represents the concentration of the extract (mg/mL) required to inhibit 50% of the free radical-scavenging activity; higher SC50 value indicates lower radical scavenging activity.
The free radical scavenging capacity of various solvent extracts of guava seeds was measured by using 1, 1- diphenyl-2-picrilhydrazyl (DPPH) assay (Juntachote and Berghofer 2005). Aliquot (100 μL) of extract was mixed with 5 ml of 6×10–3 M methanolic solution of DPPH radical. The mixture was shaken vigorously and left to stand for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance was then measured at 517 nm
against a blank. The control was prepared, as above, without any extract and methanol was used for the base line correction. The radical-scavenging activity was expressed as percentage of inhibition and calculated using the following formula:
% Radical scavenging activity
% Radical scavenging activity
=( ½ðAbs control−Abs sampleÞ/ Abs control x 100:
Where, Abs control is the absorbance of DPPH radical +
methanol; Abs sample is the absorbance of DPPH radical +
sample extract/standard.
References.
Juntachote T, Berghofer E (2005) Antioxidative properties and stability of
ethanolic extracts of Holy basil and Galangal. Food Chem 92:193–
202
El Anany, A.M. (2014) . Nutritional composition, antinutritional factors, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of guava seeds (Psidium Myrtaceae) as affected by roasting processes . Journal of Food Science and Technology
I agree with Oktay Yildiz to express it as EC50 values: to do so you should incubate methanolic solutions with different concentration of the antioxidant and the same concentration of DPPH for each one in the darkness for a certain time, i.e. 30 minutes (exactly for each sample), then measure the absorbance at 515-517 nm. The value of DPPH, expressed as %Remaining DPPH will be calculated as:
%DPPH remaining = Absorbance sample/ Absorbance control x 100
The control will be a methanolic solution with just DPPH
Then you will represent the values of %DPPH remaining versus sample concentration of your samples, so you can get the value of EC50 (Effective concentration) which is the concentration of antioxidant able to destroy 50% of the initial DPPH. The values are usually given as micromolar concentration.
For more information you can check Prior, R.L.; Wu, X.; Schaich, K. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4290-4302.
I don't understand why all these answers are different. Does nobody use a standard like ascorbic acid or different dilutions of DPPH to make a standard curve?
Ten g (10 g) of sample were homogenized with100 ml methanol for 1 min and centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 15 min at 4 ◦C. The clear supernatant was transferred to a glass bottle and measured immediately for total antioxidant activity using DPPH assay. 100 μL of sample were added to 5 ml DPPH solution and the absorbance of DPPH reagent was determined at 515 nm after 30 min of incubation(15). The inhibition percentage of the absorbance was calculated as follows:
Inhibition % = (Abst0 - Abst30 min)/ Abst0 ×100
Abst0 min was the absorbance of DPPH at time 0. Abst30 min was the absorbance of DPPH after 30 min of incubation.
I use standard curve, but still wondering how to express the results (only Total fraction, not methanolic). Does anyone can explain me how to do one of the options (mM/Kg, mmol/l.)?
Alessia Di Capua, YES. it is all about how much antioxydant (in the extract) is needed to destroy 50% DPPH. When the IC50 is high, the antioxydant effect is low, because the extract is poor in antioxydant, this is why we need to increase the concentration of the extract. In contrast, when the concentration of the extract needed to destroy 50% of DPPH is low, it means that the extract is rich in antioxydant (no need for high concentration of extract)
when A0 represents the absorbance value of the zero removal group; Amax represents the absorbance value of the blank group; Ap represents the absorbance value of the sample group; Ac represents the absorbance value of the control group.
It depends on the concentrations you're working on. You can prepare a stock solution (e.g 100 mg of crude extract in 2 mL of methanol which gives you a stock conc. of 50 mg/mL). Then, from your stock prepare your working concentrations using two-fold serial dilution.