Environmental justice scholarship engages multiple conceptual themes and angles across traditions. Schlosberg (2004) introduced the notion of recognition as part of understanding movements for environmental justice, and since then there have been discussions about self-recognition (Álvarez and Coolsaet 2020). However, the notion of self-affirmation has been introduced by Temper (2019) who states that, '...beyond recognition, what is needed is epistemic justice and self-affirmation' (pg. 104). Is there a difference between self-recognition and self-affirmation? If so, how do they differ?
Tamara Steger Mirzohid R. Koriyev
Yes, there is a distinction between self-recognition and self-affirmation in the context of environmental justice scholarship.
Self-recognition, as introduced by Schlosberg, refers to the acknowledgment and validation of one's identity, experiences, and concerns within the broader environmental justice movement. It involves recognizing the diversity of voices, perspectives, and struggles within marginalized communities affected by environmental injustices.
On the other hand, self-affirmation, as proposed by Temper, goes beyond mere recognition. It emphasizes the importance of empowering marginalized communities to assert their knowledge, values, and ways of knowing in the pursuit of environmental justice. Self-affirmation involves validating and promoting the epistemic authority and agency of these communities, enabling them to actively shape decision-making processes and actions related to environmental issues.
In essence, while self-recognition focuses on acknowledging the existence and diversity of marginalized voices, self-affirmation extends this concept by emphasizing the empowerment and validation of those voices, ensuring their active participation and influence in environmental justice efforts.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Statistics
- Survey