In recent times, there has been considerable debate regarding the publishing practices of MDPI, with some in the academic community raising concerns about the potential predatory nature of some of its journals. Despite MDPI's defense of their practices, various institutions have begun advising their researchers against publishing with them, citing concerns about the quality and integrity of the peer-review process and the potential impact on the researchers' professional reputation.

Given the conflicting views, I am interested in gathering a broader perspective on the following points:

  • What has been your personal experience with MDPI journals, if any, in terms of the peer-review process, editorial handling, and overall quality of published research?
  • How does your institution view publications in MDPI journals? Are there any specific guidelines or policies in place regarding publishing in MDPI or similar publishers?
  • What do you believe are the essential criteria for distinguishing between reputable open-access publishers and those considered predatory?
  • How should the academic community navigate the challenges posed by the proliferation of open-access publishers to ensure the integrity of scholarly publishing?
  • I am looking forward to a constructive discussion that could help many researchers make informed decisions about where to publish their work.

    More William Rojas-Carabali's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions