Several doctorates and NHS groups have undertaken cost benefits analysis of treatment modalities such as the adding of fluoride to public or minimum invasive preparations or ART in reduction in decay.

I am seeking to compare the benefit of introducing a high tech approach to rural communities outreach programs to reduce the number of teeth lost due to primary intervention options being limited in the field.There is convincing evidence that the loss of teeth and POPS will have a devastating effect on cognitive and psychological factors relevant to patients QoL.  

Does anyone know of any similar studies (in whatever field)?

More Marc Slabbert's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions